This channel is intended for people just starting with the Raku Programming Language (raku.org). Logs are available at irclogs.raku.org/raku-beginner/live.html
Set by lizmat on 8 June 2022.
shad.ow to flatten out the 2d list before summing it 00:15
nemokosch why not just use .flat?
shad.ow that works ? 00:17
perl [0] > [[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]].flat ([1 2 3] [4 5 6])
am i misunderstanding something
nemokosch I think your original case would work
shad.ow wdym 00:18
perl my @lines = "input.txt".IO.lines; my %gears; for @lines.kv -> $j, $line { for $line.comb(/<-[\d.]>/, :match) { %gears{.from + $j * i} = []; } } for @lines.kv -> $j, $line { for $line.comb(/\d+/, :match) { for ($_.from - 1)..($_.to) -> $y { for ($j - 1)..($j + 1) -> $x { %gears{$y + $x * i}.append(+$_) if %gears{$y + $x * i}:exists; } } } } say (gather
%gears.values.deepmap(*.take)).sum; say %gears.values.map({ .elems == 2 ?? $_[0] * $_[1] !! 0 }).sum;
nemokosch but to be fair I'd have to check
shad.ow this is what i have rn
it's a 2d list
the values in the hash are lists
the keys are complex numbers
representing 2d coordinates
nemokosch oh damn, not this again... 00:19
why even have flat if it "respects" containers, and why do containers "itemize"...
shad.ow >>.List.flat seems to work 00:20
nemokosch m: my %gears = a => (1, 2), b => (4, 6); %gears.values.map(*.Slip).say;
Raku eval (4 6 1 2)
nemokosch this also works
shad.ow how does that work
perl %gears{$y + $x * i}.append(+$_) if %gears{$y + $x * i}:exists;
also is there a better way to write this
nemokosch a Slip is a "List without the parens around it" 00:21
shad.ow append to a list in a hash if it's in the hash
ahh
nemokosch meaning that it auto-flattens into its context
fortunately, the method call eliminates the Scalar containers
m: ($(1, 2).Slip, (3, 4).Slip).say 00:22
Raku eval (1 2 3 4)
nemokosch does the same for both
shad.ow i see
sorry yesterday was my first day with raku / perl
kind of pieceing things together as i go
i am doing advent of code in a different language each day lmao 00:23
cool language so far tho
any ideas for this pattern ?
nemokosch this is always an active time of the year... kind of
shad.ow yeah real 00:24
00:24 teatime joined
nemokosch well, you already have a topic so it kinda pushes one from using a shortcut that makes use of the topic variable 00:25
shad.ow because if i remove that if
it'll initialize an empty list in the gears
nemokosch with %gears{$y + $x * i} -> $current-gear { $current-gear.append(+$_); }
not exactly the same I think, not sure how the :exists check works
this checks for an undefined value
shad.ow ahh interesting
i guess what i have now is fine 00:27
perl my @lines = "input.txt".IO.lines; my %gears; for @lines.kv -> $j, $line { for $line.comb(/<-[\d.]>/, :match) { %gears{.from + $j * i} = []; } } for @lines.kv -> $j, $line { for $line.comb(/\d+/, :match) { for ($_.from - 1)..($_.to) -> $y { for ($j - 1)..($j + 1) -> $x { %gears{$y + $x * i}.append(+$_) if %gears{$y + $x * i}:exists; } } } } say
%gears.values.map(*.Slip).sum; say %gears.values.map({ .elems == 2 ?? $_[0] * $_[1] !! 0 }).sum;
this is quite gorgeous
thanks for the help !
perl say ($_[0] * $_[1] if .elems == 2 for %gears.values).sum; 00:33
this is nice too
ohhh i see waht you mean now 00:38
00:54 sdomi left 00:55 sdomi joined 02:56 swaggboi left 03:02 swaggboi joined
jaumegreen I have a doubt with SetHash, how do I set and check a key via variables? Let me explain: my %numbers is SetHash; my $factor = 10; my $posy = 2; my $posx = 3;say "empty ",%numbers.keys.sort; #empty () say "empty ",%numbers<$posy*$factor+$posx>," ",%numbers<23>;#empty False False %numbers<$posy*$factor+$posx>++; say "vars ",%numbers.keys.sort; #vars 07:45
($posy*$factor+$posx) say "vars ",%numbers<$posy*$factor+$posx>," ",%numbers<23>;#vars True False %numbers.set($posy*$factor+$posx); say "set ",%numbers.keys.sort; #set ($posy*$factor+$posx 23) say "set ",%numbers<$posy*$factor+$posx>," ",%numbers<23>;#set True False %numbers{$posy*$factor+$posx}=True; say "key ",%numbers.keys.sort; #key ($posy*$factor+$posx 23) say
"key ",%numbers<$posy*$factor+$posx>," ",%numbers<23>;#key True False So, it seems that 23 is set as a key (both the 2nd and 3rd way work), but at the same time it evaluates to false. And the only one that evaluates to true is the first one set, which stores the formula. I see no example with variables on the documentation, so I'm a little bit lost on why this doesn't work and how to make it work. Can anyone explain
it to me? Thanks.
rcmlz m: my $key = 1; my %hash; %hash{$key} = $key; dd %hash; 09:24
Raku eval Hash %hash = {"1" => 1}
rcmlz To my understanding accessing %hash<> requires a string between the <>. 09:25
whereas %hash{} also accepts variables. 09:26
m: my $key = 1; my %hash; %hash<$key> = $key; dd %hash; 09:27
Raku eval Hash %hash = {"\$key" => 1}
ab5tract m: my $key = "k|"; my %hash; %hash«$key» = True; dd %hash.keys 09:32
camelia ("k|",).Seq
ab5tract m: my $key = "k"; my %hash; %hash«$key» = True; dd %hash.keys 09:33
camelia ("k",).Seq
jaumegreen Setting it it's not much of a problem, but the retrieval is problematic, neither %numbers<$key> nor %numbers<23>return true to me. 09:35
Nahita %numbers<stuff> is doing %numbers{'stuff'} as a shortcut and single quotes don't interpolate, so 1) your formula is put literally there
2) when you do %numbers<23>, you request %numbers{'23'}, i.e., string 23, not Integer, so it doesn't give you True
because you set 23 the Integer with the .set method 09:36
jaumegreen ok, it seem that %numbers{$key} work. Thanks
And thanks for the string vs integer explanation. It will probably help in the future 🙂 09:37
ab5tract jaumegreen: or %h«$var», if you like those braces better
well actually that won't solve the Int vs Str issue 09:38
Nahita FWIW, with <<stuff>>, when stuff is Integer, SetHash registers an IntStr
unlike normal Hashes i guess
so either .set method or {...}++ seems leading to more predictable behaviour 09:39
ab5tract that likely means that «$var» calls `val($var)`, which would make sense 09:41
nemokosch That sounds problematic on many layers 09:59
DarthGandalf Hi, how to make an array to be initialized with lazy sequence which always returns 0? I want to read non-existing elements from the array to sum them up, but that results in "Int + 42" 10:48
Nahita hi, what about my @arr is default(0) or you can maybe .grep at the summing time 10:51
DarthGandalf thanks, I couldn't figure how to use .grep for that - {$_==Int} doesn't work; but is default works 10:54
Nahita i would grep defined ones instead of particularly Int ones (although for Int equality you can use triple ===), like .grep(*.defined) 10:55
because == is numeric equality checker
DarthGandalf ah, I was looking for .definite but that's only on how class >< 10:56
lizmat DarthGandalf: if your int values fit within 64 bits, then you could also do: my int @array
DarthGandalf oh, even better 10:57
thanks
11:48 foo63 joined
ab5tract m: (0, ‘a’, 11).grep(Int) ==> dd() 12:41
camelia (0, 11).Seq
ab5tract The idiomatic way to check of something is of a type is to use smartmatch. The above thunks the type into the rhs of a smartmatch 12:43
DarthGandalf m: (0, 'a', Int, 11).grep(Int) ==> dd() 12:57
camelia (0, Int, 11).Seq
ab5tract m: (0, Int).grep(Int:D) ==> dd() 12:59
camelia (0,).Seq
ab5tract We call those “smileys” :D 13:01
m: +(0,8,Int x 5, 9).grep(Int:U) ==> dd() 13:03
camelia Use of uninitialized value of type Int in string context.
Methods .^name, .raku, .gist, or .say can be used to stringify it to something meaningful.
in block <unit> at <tmp> line 1
0
ab5tract Dang autocorrect
m: +(0,8,Int xx 5, 9).grep(Int:U) ==> dd()
camelia 0
ab5tract Huh..
lizmat And yet another Rakudo Weekly News hits the Net: rakudoweekly.blog/2023/12/04/2023-...g-this-ad/ 13:05
ab5tract m: +(0,8,|(Int xx 5), 9).grep(Int:U) ==> dd() 13:06
camelia 5
lizmat m: say 5 ~~ Int:U 13:08
camelia False
lizmat interesting... 13:09
also: afk for a few hours&
nemokosch Interesting? Seems okay to me 13:12
ab5tract Probably a misread. 13:31
nemokosch m: (0,8,|(Int xx 5), 9).grep(Int:U).elems.&dd 13:35
Raku eval 5
19:23 meooow_ joined 19:25 gfldex_ joined, meooow left 19:26 gfldex left
fridge777 is there a way to set multiple keys in a hash at once from a list with subscripts, something like %m{@keys} = $value ? 20:37
nemokosch you might need to replicate the value on the right handside 20:39
other than that, I think it can work
fridge777 oh. yep that did it actually! thank you 😄 20:40
nemokosch 🍬 20:42
22:15 foo63 left
drudgesentinel I'm trying to determine whether the following is valid use of trans sub translate-lines ($line) { $line.trans([ /<?after o>ne/, "two", "three", "four", "five", "six", "seven", /<?after e>ight/, "nine" ] => [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ]); } I get expected values for simple cases, e.g. my $working-example = "onetwo3"; #o123 But for numbers that 22:38
'share' letters, raku seems to hang: my $gotcha = "twone"; # ctrl + C after 1 minutes
The former example seems to imply the lookbehind works ok 22:39
nemokosch I've never heard about trans taking regular expressions
gotta check the implementation though...
drudgesentinel Maybe I'm misintepreting the docs: Regexes work as keys I assume that the first set passed are the keys, and the 'replacements' the values in this context 22:40
I was previously just calling it like <one two three> => <1 2 3> but unfortunately my input had some shared letters in them 22:41
nemokosch you can be right, I wouldn't know offhand
it really does hang 22:46
m: 'twone'.trans((/<?after o>ne/, 'two') => (1, 2))
Raku eval Failed while reading stream: Max execution time exceeded
drudgesentinel I suppose I could just split it into separate trans calls 22:48
be a shame though
nemokosch it can still just be a bug tbh 22:49
I think it cannot hurt opening an issue for it. It's not obvious at the very least why this needs to happen 22:53
.vushu @antononcube I made this module raku.land/zef:vushu/FEN::Grammar, maybe you could you this to render the chessboard the way you desire. 22:58
23:00 habere-et-disper joined
habere-et-disper Thinking about FOSDEM. Where to focus more: 23:12
At play with raku -- Unstructured learning via suggestibility, or
At war with raku -- Combatting militaristic metaphors
Otherwise I'll juggle both. Any preferences ? Thanks for your thoughts ! (y) :]