|
00:39
Disco-Frog joined
00:54
Disco-Frog left
02:43
Oshawott left
03:18
Guest35 left
03:48
Guest41 joined
|
|||
| Guest41 | Is there a way to run Prove6 in "watch mode" easily? Like an interactive test runner. I might have to build something that watches for file changes, or something to run on save. | 04:07 | |
|
04:23
Guest41 left
05:17
razetime joined
05:19
razetime left,
razetime joined
06:13
archenoth joined
06:14
frost joined
07:18
razetime left
|
|||
| lizmat | Guest41: docs.raku.org/routine/watch | 07:56 | |
|
11:47
razetime joined
|
|||
| piotrklibert | Guest41: it's very easy to do thanks to a few features of Raku. It was one of the first things I wrote with it: github.com/piotrklibert/relearn/bl...ku#L45-L51 | 11:49 | |
| Oh, by the way, on topic of files. Why the heck `IO::Path.absolute` returns a string? | 11:52 | ||
| lizmat | because that's considered more low level, and is usually used by routines that are closer to the metal | 11:54 | |
| also: an absolute path doesn't need any knowledge about current working directory or OS dependent details such as / vs \ | 11:55 | ||
| piotrklibert | Hmm, ok, that brings me to lots of questions about Raku's object model, but I'll leave that for later 🙂 | 12:12 | |
| On another note, do we have an Emacs user here? | 12:13 | ||
| lizmat | not /me | ||
| piotrklibert | I'd be happy to know if they succeeded in setting up "go to definition" for Raku. | 12:14 | |
| lizmat | fully Stockholm syndromed to vi :-) | ||
| piotrklibert | (might be hard to be 100% correct, but getting at least the more obvious cases would be nice) | 12:15 | |
| Ah. My respect. I remember going through Vim withdrawal after switching to Emacs. | |||
| (I had to. Support for Lisps, and particularly Common Lisp, in Vim was simply nowhere near that of Emacs, so when I started learning CL seriously ~2012 I had to make a switch, after 5 years with Vim. Adopting Emacs was hard, but leaving Vim - much more so :)) | 12:21 | ||
|
12:23
razetime left
13:39
discord-raku-bot left
13:40
discord-raku-bot joined
|
|||
| Nemokosch | I can even imagine that Emacs is better overall but things went in a way that only diehard CS nerds (old mathematicians in particular) use Emacs 😛 | 13:42 | |
| the counter culture | |||
|
14:15
frost left
14:18
Guest35 joined
|
|||
| piotrklibert | Well, there are some advantages to using Emacs, but they tend to matter mostly to die-hard nerds. Who else would need support for syntax highlighting, indentation, and auto-completion for languages that don't even make the top 50 on TIOBE? | 14:27 | |
| CIAvash | I think the best thing we have so far for Emacs' "go to definition" is using ctags. `ctags --language-force=perl6 -e **/*.rakumod`, something like that, but that only finds functions and methods. Another option is improving ctags or adding support for Raku to the `dumb-jump` package. Or wait for a language server for Raku. | 16:04 | |
| piotrklibert | > adding support for Raku to the dumb-jump package | 16:17 | |
| Might be worth an effort, I use the package anyway. | |||
| > Or wait for a language server for Raku. | |||
| I think I've seen some blog post referencing LSP implementation for Raku, it would be really helpful if completed. Is it being developed as part of Rakudo, or something separate? | |||
| Morfent | such a project would involve rakuast sooner or later i'd imagine | 16:39 | |
|
18:29
n1to joined
23:10
n1to left
|
|||
| Nemokosch | only asking this because it's Raku of all languages... | 23:43 | |
| is there something like a multidimensional search? | |||