|
This channel is intended for people just starting with the Raku Programming Language (raku.org). Logs are available at irclogs.raku.org/raku-beginner/live.html Set by lizmat on 8 June 2022. |
|||
|
00:03
deoac left
00:13
habere-et-disper left
00:26
Kaiepi left
00:29
Kaiepi joined
|
|||
| guifa | habere-et-disper it's doing scalar-style assignment | 01:00 | |
| m: my UInt ( $foo, @bar ) := ( 3, [14] ); say $foo, @bar; | 01:01 | ||
| camelia | 3[14] | ||
| guifa | binding works though | ||
|
01:56
Kaiepi left
02:01
razetime joined
02:04
frost joined
03:03
frost left
03:05
frost joined
|
|||
| jaguart | m: my @foo of Int = 33,44,'a'; | 03:22 | |
| camelia | Type check failed in assignment to @foo; expected Int but got Str ("a") in block <unit> at <tmp> line 1 |
||
| jaguart | m: my ( @foo of Int) = 33,44,'a' | ||
| camelia | ( no output ) | ||
| jaguart | hmm my repl says this results in ([33 44 a]) | 03:23 | |
| m: my (UInt $foo, @bar of UInt ) = ( 3, 14,15,'a' ) | 03:24 | ||
| camelia | ( no output ) | ||
| jaguart | m: my (UInt $foo, @bar of UInt ) = ( 3, 14,15,'a' ); @bar.raku | 03:25 | |
| camelia | ( no output ) | ||
| jaguart | Again, my repl (2022.7) ends up with @bar containing an 'a' | 03:26 | |
| guifa | jaguart: I can confirm that. And it's that the `of Foo` isn't applied | ||
| golfed: | 03:27 | ||
| m: my (@foo of Int) = 1,'a'; say @foo; say @foo.of | |||
| camelia | [1 a] (Mu) |
||
| jaguart | it works as expected with no brackets :o | 03:28 | |
| guifa | The parentheses induce special handling, and certain attributes aren't be applied as a result | 03:32 | |
| jaguart | M: my (UInt @bar) = 1,2; @bar.raku | 03:34 | |
| gives this in my repl: Array[<anon>].new(1, 2) | |||
| m: my UInt @bar = 1,2; @bar.raku | 03:35 | ||
| camelia | ( no output ) | ||
| jaguart | gives: Array[UInt].new(1, 2) | ||
| m: my UInt @bar = 1,2; say @bar.raku | 03:38 | ||
| camelia | Array[UInt].new(1, 2) | ||
| jaguart | m: my (UInt @bar) = 1,2,'a'; say @bar.raku | ||
| camelia | Type check failed in assignment to @bar; expected <anon> but got Str ("a") in block <unit> at <tmp> line 1 |
||
| jaguart | m: my (@bar of UInt) = 1,2,'a'; say @bar.raku | 03:39 | |
| camelia | [1, 2, "a"] | ||
|
03:46
razetime left
04:32
razetime joined
04:53
Heptite left
05:50
frost left
06:02
razetime left
06:03
razetime joined
06:12
razetime left,
razetime joined
07:26
Kaiepi joined
07:34
Kaiepi left
07:39
razetime left,
razetime_ joined
07:45
razetime_ is now known as razetime,
razetime left,
razetime joined
07:46
habere-et-disper joined
07:48
Kaiepi joined
08:08
frost joined
08:18
razetime left
08:19
frost left
08:24
frost joined
09:12
dakkar joined
09:31
codesections left
|
|||
| rcmlz | Hello, I was wondering whether there is a more Rakuish way of generating all subsequences in an array. The function .combinations gets close, but I did not succeed in finding a correct usage. Here is my not-so-nice solution, any thoughts on how to make that more elegant? | 10:28 | |
| m: | |||
| sub subsequences(@input){ | |||
| my $n = @input.elems(); | |||
| my @result; | |||
| for ^$n { | |||
| my $subseq_len = $_ + 1; | |||
| for ^$n -> $i { # start at every element of array | |||
| my @subsequenz; | |||
| @subsequenz.append(@input[$i]); | |||
| for 1..^$subseq_len -> $j { # add $subseq_len elements | |||
| @subsequenz.append(@input[$j]); | |||
| } | |||
| m: | 10:30 | ||
| sub subsequences(@input){ | |||
| my $n = @input.elems(); | |||
| my @result; | |||
| for ^$n { | |||
| my $subseq_len = $\_ + 1; | |||
| for ^$n -> $i { # start at every element of array | |||
| my @subsequenz; | |||
| @subsequenz.append(@input[$i]); | |||
| for 1..^$subseq_len -> $j { # add $subseq_len elements | |||
| @subsequenz.append(@input[$j]); | |||
| } | |||
| lizmat | please post code in a gist | 10:31 | |
| rcmlz | How do I post code in a gist? | 10:36 | |
| Nahita | hello rcmlz i think they mean gist.github.com/ or pastebin.com/ or hastebin.com/ kind of things | 10:40 | |
| rcmlz | gist.github.com/rcmlz/5c33ae1a2cd2...b23c7a1c14 | ||
| Nahita | because the message is from IRC bridge and not sure how multiple line code blocks are seen there | ||
| rcmlz | <@836605577400549436> Thank you. I was reading gist() in Raku and did not get it. Now it is clear. | 10:42 | |
|
10:46
rcmlz joined
|
|||
| I logged in to IRC to see what a mess I created there by pasting so much code ... | 10:52 | ||
| irclogs.raku.org/raku-beginner/live.html shows me, that indeed it became unreadable. Sorry, I did not know that. Will use gist in the future. | 10:53 | ||
| lizmat | thank you :-) | ||
| sorry for being a bit grumpy in the early morning | |||
|
10:54
frost left
|
|||
| lizmat | looking at the gist, feels like lines 9-11 can be simplified to: | 10:56 | |
| @subsequenz.append(@input[1..^$subseq_len]); | |||
| rcmlz | Hello, I was wondering whether there is a more Rakuish way of generating all subsequences in an array. The function .combinations gets close, but I did not succeed in finding a correct usage. Here is my not-so-nice solution, any thoughts on how to make that more elegant? | 10:57 | |
| gist.github.com/rcmlz/5c33ae1a2cd2...b23c7a1c14 | |||
| lizmat | I see that you want to return a Set at the end | ||
| perhaps docs.raku.org/type/SetHash#method_set could be of use ? | 10:58 | ||
| so not create an array, but create a SetHash | |||
| rcmlz | No, Set or Array does not matter | 10:59 | |
| lizmat | if you really want to return an immutable Set, you could coerce it to a Set on line 15 | ||
| rcmlz | array, list, set - anything I can later itterate over is fine | ||
| lizmat : indeed, using the range saved me one loop. gist.github.com/rcmlz/3e604059949f...80265459a2 | 11:29 | ||
|
11:30
frost joined
11:33
rcmlz left
11:48
habere-et-disper left
12:03
rcmlz joined
12:05
rcmlz left
12:19
frost left
12:28
rcmlz joined
12:43
rcmlz left
13:22
mahafyi joined
13:49
rcmlz joined
13:59
codesections joined
|
|||
| mahafyi | Inline::Perl will use only system installed version, or can allow for a perlbew verision also? | 14:08 | |
|
14:49
mahafyi left
15:02
codesections left
15:04
codesections joined
|
|||
| rcmlz | I developed two versions of a function that are doing the same. Is there a prefered way in Raku to compare the performance of them depending on the input size? gist.github.com/rcmlz/3e604059949f...80265459a2 | 15:25 | |
| How do you usually measure speed and memory usage of two alternatives? | 15:27 | ||
|
15:33
razetime joined
16:22
razetime left
16:23
razetime joined
16:25
rcmlz left
16:28
rcmlz joined
16:29
Heptite joined
16:51
codesections left,
codesections joined
17:07
codesections left
17:08
codesections joined
17:20
razetime left
17:26
rcmlz left
17:32
dakkar left
17:44
codesections left
17:45
codesections joined
18:02
mahafyi joined
|
|||
| avuserow | rcmlz: there are a few Benchmark modules in the ecosystem. I've been using "Bench" lately. There's also Benchmark and Benchy. | 19:13 | |
| .tell rcmlz there are a few Benchmark modules in the ecosystem. I've been using "Bench" lately. There's also Benchmark and Benchy. | |||
|
20:06
codesections left
20:08
codesections joined
20:25
ToddAndMargo joined,
ToddAndMargo left,
ToddAndMargo joined
20:46
tirnanog joined
20:52
codesections left,
codesections joined
20:59
ToddAndMargo left
21:00
codesections left
21:01
codesections joined
21:42
ToddAndMargo joined
22:21
codesections left
22:23
codesections joined,
codesections left
22:24
codesections joined,
codesections left
22:25
codesections joined
22:28
codesections left,
codesections joined
22:31
ToddAndMargo left
22:48
bigfondue left
23:18
codesections left
23:19
codesections joined
23:29
Heptite left
23:33
Heptite joined
23:34
codesections left
23:35
codesections joined
23:53
codesections left
23:54
codesections joined,
codesections left
23:55
codesections joined
23:56
codesections left
23:57
codesections joined,
codesections left
|
|||