|
This channel is intended for people just starting with the Raku Programming Language (raku.org). Logs are available at irclogs.raku.org/raku-beginner/live.html Set by lizmat on 8 June 2022. |
|||
|
02:33
arkiuat left
02:46
arkiuat joined
02:50
arkiuat left
03:09
arkiuat joined
03:13
arkiuat left
03:17
arkiuat joined
03:50
stanrifkin joined
03:52
stanrifkin_ left
|
|||
| disbot8 | <simon_sibl> maybe its because of perl, but I get confuse, the sigil use to tell me whats inside the variable, $scalar, a @list, a @hash, but now with a for @2d_array -> $1d_array, I cannot tell whats inside anymore just by looking at it | 04:51 | |
| <simon_sibl> and perl can have "list" in a scalar but then thats a reference that needs to be dereference by @{} or ->@* which shows whats inside | 04:52 | ||
|
05:09
Guest81 joined
05:10
Guest81 left
05:42
arkiuat left
05:45
arkiuat joined
|
|||
| disbot8 | <jubilatious1_98524> > [Z] is the reduction metaoperator applied to the ordinary Z operator, which is an infix synonym of the zip routine. | 05:50 | |
| <jubilatious1_98524> Yeah, that I knew. | |||
|
05:50
arkiuat left
06:19
arkiuat joined
06:23
arkiuat left
06:48
arkiuat joined
06:53
arkiuat left
|
|||
| disbot8 | <librasteve> @simon_sibl … good point … I think the best way to start with raku (esp from a perl background) is to use $scalar, @array and %hash in your code. I think that Larry (Wall) did a good job in maintaining the sigil idea at the “top” level. Then (as you have already seen) the idea of itemizing (aka containers) maps onto perl references … but raku automates that. To keep track of what an Array (or a Hash) | 07:05 | |
| contains, then raku types are your friend like my Int @levels; | |||
|
07:22
arkiuat joined
07:28
librasteve_ joined,
arkiuat left
|
|||
| disbot8 | <simon_sibl> oh for what an Array or Hash contains, I can manage, but its knowing what a $var contains xD as you said the reference thing is automated in Raku, so sometimes its "difficult" to know what structure is inside | 07:37 | |
|
07:50
human-blip left
07:52
human-blip joined
07:57
arkiuat joined
08:01
hudo_ joined,
arkiuat left
08:03
kjp left,
hudo__ left
08:06
kjp joined
08:25
arkiuat joined
08:30
arkiuat left
08:43
arkiuat joined
08:48
arkiuat left
09:01
arkiuat joined
09:05
arkiuat left
09:19
arkiuat joined
09:23
arkiuat left
09:43
arkiuat joined
09:48
arkiuat left
10:03
cpli left,
cpli joined
10:19
arkiuat joined
10:24
arkiuat left
10:43
arkiuat joined
10:47
arkiuat left
11:01
arkiuat joined
11:07
arkiuat left
11:19
arkiuat joined
11:24
arkiuat left
11:45
arkiuat joined
11:53
arkiuat left
12:08
arkiuat joined
12:12
arkiuat left
12:20
arkiuat joined
12:25
arkiuat left
12:44
arkiuat joined
12:49
arkiuat left
13:18
arkiuat joined
13:22
arkiuat left
13:47
arkiuat joined
13:51
arkiuat left
14:16
arkiuat joined
14:20
arkiuat left
14:48
arkiuat joined
14:53
arkiuat left
15:12
arkiuat joined
|
|||
| disbot8 | <shalokshalom> I am looking for a way to perform exhaustive checks on proto, in the same sense that I can with closed sum types. | 17:01 | |
| <antononcube> Use outer product. | 17:08 | ||
|
17:22
librasteve_ left
19:07
habere-et-disper joined
21:35
habere-et-disper left
22:29
arkiuat left
22:30
arkiuat joined
22:57
stanrifkin left
|
|||