02:00 deadmarshal left 02:04 deadmarshal joined 02:47 dano2 joined 02:49 dano left, dano2 is now known as dano 02:54 sibl joined 02:58 dano2 joined 02:59 sibl left, dano left, dano2 is now known as dano 03:22 arunvickram joined 03:26 arunvickram left, arunvickram joined 03:29 arunvickram left 03:30 arunvickram joined 03:46 arkiuat left 03:48 arkiuat joined 03:57 arkiuat left, arunvickram left 03:58 arunvickram joined, arkiuat joined 04:01 sibl joined 04:03 arkiuat left 04:06 sibl left, arkiuat joined 04:07 sibl joined 04:11 arkiuat left 04:20 arunvickram left 04:21 arkiuat joined 04:27 arkiuat left 04:35 arkiuat joined 04:42 arunvickram joined 04:45 arkiuat left 04:52 arkiuat joined 04:54 arunvickram left 05:48 kjp left 05:49 kjp joined 05:51 kjp left, kjp joined 07:54 atcroft left 08:03 Guest11 joined
Guest11 Hello, can I ask question about reduce on a list of hash? I have `[>>+<<] {a => 1, b => 2}, {b => 3, c => 4}, {c => 5, d => 6}` worked as expected (result = {a => 1, b => 5, c => 9, d => 6}), but `[>>max<<] {a => 1, b => 2}, {b => 3, c => 4}, {c => 5, d => 6}` not work. What's the problem? 08:08
08:08 arkiuat left 08:21 sibl left, sibl joined 08:32 Guest42 joined 08:33 Guest42 left 08:38 arkiuat joined 08:42 arkiuat left 08:51 Guest11 left 09:10 arkiuat joined 09:15 arkiuat left 09:29 dakkar joined 09:44 arkiuat joined 09:53 arkiuat left 10:00 sibl left 10:05 arkiuat joined 10:06 librasteve_ left 10:10 arkiuat left 10:30 librasteve_ joined
nemokosch mad respect for having any specific expectation for these complex snippets 10:32
it probably has something to do with the fact that max is list associativ 10:35
10:40 arkiuat joined 10:42 sjn left, Nemokosch joined 10:43 sjn joined 10:45 arkiuat left 10:51 arkiuat joined
phew... seems like this never worked, I got a bit scared it's some sort of regression 11:10
11:13 arkiuat left
Nemokosch sub infix:<max2>($a, $b) is assoc<left> { $a max $b }; dd [>>max2<<] {a => 1, b => 2}, {b => 3, c => 4}, {c => 5, d => 6} 11:14
m: sub infix:<max2>($a, $b) is assoc<left> { $a max $b }; dd [>>max2<<] {a => 1, b => 2}, {b => 3, c => 4}, {c => 5, d => 6}
camelia {:a(1), :b(3), :c(5), :d(6)}
Nemokosch is this the expected behavior? 11:15
11:15 Nemokosch left 11:27 arkiuat joined 11:31 arkiuat left 11:40 sibl joined 11:51 arkiuat joined 11:56 arkiuat left 12:21 arkiuat joined 12:26 arkiuat left 12:42 arkiuat joined 12:47 arkiuat left 12:50 arunvickram joined, arunvickram left 12:51 arunvickram joined 13:05 arkiuat joined 13:10 arkiuat left 13:11 sibl left 13:23 arkiuat joined 13:28 arkiuat left 13:41 arkiuat joined 13:46 arkiuat left 14:10 arkiuat joined 14:16 arkiuat left 14:23 arunvickram left 14:44 arkiuat joined 14:49 arkiuat left 14:52 arunvickram joined 14:53 atcroft joined 14:57 Guest11 joined 14:58 Guest11 left 15:00 arkiuat joined, arunvickram left 15:01 Guest11 joined
Guest11 @Nemokosch, yes, `sub infix:<max2>($a, $b) is assoc<left> { $a max $b }; dd [>>max2<<] {a => 1, b => 2}, {b => 3, c => 4}, {c => 5, d => 6}` works, thanks. 15:03
15:03 Guest11 left 15:07 arkiuat left, arkiuat joined 15:14 arkiuat left
nemokosch 🥳 15:22
15:22 arkiuat joined
jubilatious1_98524 Hi, didn't I wander into the Beginner's forum? :cameliathink: 15:24
librasteve all we need now is a one liner
always makes me smile that the raku-beginner is like Python advanced 15:25
(sorry, I mentioned a P-word again)
nemokosch I don't know, it's almost like a running joke by now 15:28
15:32 arkiuat left 15:36 arkiuat joined 15:41 arkiuat left 15:56 arkiuat joined 16:27 Guest11 joined 16:28 Guest11 is now known as quiddicit 16:29 quiddicit left, quiddicit joined 16:30 quiddicit is now known as guestll 16:32 arkiuat left 16:34 guestll left 16:44 arkiuat joined 16:48 arkiuat left 16:52 arkiuat joined 17:45 dakkar left 18:26 librasteve_ left 18:55 librasteve_ joined 21:23 arkiuat left 21:35 arkiuat joined 21:45 arkiuat left 22:16 arkiuat joined 22:21 arkiuat left 22:37 arkiuat joined 22:55 arkiuat left 23:06 librasteve_ left