00:07 reportable6 left, reportable6 joined 01:07 Kaiepi left 02:07 japhb left 02:16 japhb joined 03:16 greppable6 left, unicodable6 left, coverable6 left, statisfiable6 left, releasable6 left, bloatable6 left, committable6 left, sourceable6 left, notable6 left, reportable6 left, linkable6 left, shareable6 left, evalable6 left, bisectable6 left, quotable6 left, tellable6 left, benchable6 left, nativecallable6 left, notable6 joined, frost joined, benchable6 joined 03:17 bisectable6 joined, committable6 joined, linkable6 joined, reportable6 joined, sourceable6 joined, quotable6 joined, unicodable6 joined, nativecallable6 joined 03:18 bloatable6 joined, statisfiable6 joined, frost left, shareable6 joined, releasable6 joined 03:19 tellable6 joined, coverable6 joined, evalable6 joined, greppable6 joined 03:22 frost joined 05:54 evalable6 left, sourceable6 left, bisectable6 left, committable6 left, statisfiable6 left, benchable6 left, linkable6 left, coverable6 left, greppable6 left, bloatable6 left, reportable6 left, quotable6 left, releasable6 left, shareable6 left, nativecallable6 left, tellable6 left, unicodable6 left, notable6 left, unicodable6 joined, benchable6 joined, tellable6 joined, reportable6 joined, statisfiable6 joined, quotable6 joined 05:55 committable6 joined, evalable6 joined 05:56 nativecallable6 joined, shareable6 joined, linkable6 joined, notable6 joined, greppable6 joined, releasable6 joined 05:57 sourceable6 joined, bloatable6 joined, coverable6 joined, bisectable6 joined 06:05 reportable6 left 06:08 reportable6 joined 07:08 nativecallable6 left, benchable6 left, linkable6 left, evalable6 left, shareable6 left, bisectable6 left, committable6 left, unicodable6 left, notable6 left, coverable6 left, sourceable6 left, greppable6 left, reportable6 left, tellable6 left, quotable6 left, releasable6 left, bloatable6 left, statisfiable6 left, tellable6 joined 07:09 statisfiable6 joined, evalable6 joined, benchable6 joined, reportable6 joined 07:10 greppable6 joined, linkable6 joined, bisectable6 joined, sourceable6 joined, shareable6 joined, committable6 joined, nativecallable6 joined, releasable6 joined 07:11 bloatable6 joined, notable6 joined, quotable6 joined, coverable6 joined, unicodable6 joined
lizmat Files=1353, Tests=117175, 295 wallclock secs (36.02 usr 10.15 sys + 4147.73 cusr 346.82 csys = 4540.72 CPU) 08:20
[Tux] Rakudo v2022.04-70-g73b43e5f9 (v6.d) on MoarVM 2022.04-3-ga9fcd5a74
csv-ip5xs0.891 - 0.918
csv-ip5xs-205.750 - 5.818
csv-parser3.642 - 3.811
csv-test-xs-200.416 - 0.430
test6.650 - 7.556
test-t1.573 - 1.594
test-t --race0.983 - 1.091
test-t-2021.937 - 22.41
test-t-20 --race7.168 - 7.353
08:26
08:42 Kaiepi joined
Geth rakudo: bea597626a | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | 2 files
Update BUILDPLAN helper module to uint renumbering
08:51
rakudo: 9fd893f74c | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | lib/BUILDPLAN.rakumod
Some more BUILDPLAN helper tweaks
09:41
09:41 sena_kun left 10:41 evalable6 left, linkable6 left 10:42 evalable6 joined, linkable6 joined 11:17 sena_kun joined 12:07 reportable6 left 12:10 reportable6 joined 12:32 MasterDuke joined
Kaiepi m: say Buf ~~ Blob 14:06
camelia True
Kaiepi i'm a bit confused by this kind of typecheck, where a role group checks a role group as a supertype of its nonsignatured candidate 14:07
because to my knowledge, that should imply that all candidates of the group have it 14:08
but a bunch of tests depend on this being true 14:09
s/should/would/ 14:10
m: role Buf[::T, :::U] { }; say Buf ~~ Blob; say Buf[1, 2] ~~ Blob 14:13
camelia False
False
Kaiepi m: role Buf[::T] does Blob[::T] { }; role Buf[::T, :::U] { }; say Buf ~~ Blob; say Buf[1, 2] ~~ Blob 14:14
camelia False
False
Kaiepi m: role Buf[::T] does Blob[T] { }; role Buf[::T, :::U] { }; say Buf ~~ Blob; say Buf[1, 2] ~~ Blob
camelia False
False
Kaiepi m: role Buf[::T] does Blob[T] { }; say Buf ~~ Blob; say Buf[1, 2] ~~ Blob
camelia ===SORRY!===
No appropriate parametric role variant available for 'Buf':
Cannot resolve caller (Buf[Int,Int]:U, Int:D, Int:D); none of these signatures matches:
(::$?CLASS ::::?CLASS Mu, ::T Mu)
Kaiepi m: role Buf[::T] does Blob[T] { }; say Buf ~~ Blob; say Buf[1] ~~ Blob
camelia False
True
Kaiepi argh, i'll get what i'm going for elsewhere 14:15
m: role Foo[::T = Mu] does Positional[T] { }; role Foo[::T, ::U] { }; say so all Foo, Foo[0], Foo[0, 1] X~~ Positional 14:17
camelia True
Kaiepi ^
14:39 linkable6 left, evalable6 left 14:40 linkable6 joined 14:42 evalable6 joined 15:35 frost left 15:40 [Coke] left 15:41 [Coke] joined 16:27 Kaiepi left 16:40 Kaiepi joined 18:01 sena_kun left 18:02 sena_kun joined 18:07 reportable6 left 18:09 reportable6 joined 18:44 Kaipei joined 18:48 Kaiepi left
releasable6 Next release in ≈4 days and ≈23 hours. 1 blocker. Please log your changes in the ChangeLog: github.com/rakudo/rakudo/wiki/ChangeLog-Draft 19:00
19:29 sena_kun left 19:31 sena_kun joined
Geth rakudo: vrurg++ created pull request #4934:
Get back to using Lock in Stash and CompUnit
20:47
Kaipei so now that i have that weirdness figured out, roast passes again w/ generic/role changes 21:07
need to give nqp its once over before i can put up a draft 21:08
21:10 Kaipei is now known as Kaiepi
Geth rakudo: ddef646171 | (Vadim Belman)++ | 9 files
Get back to using Lock in Stash and CompUnit

Use of `Lock::Soft` caused some expected, though not critical, performance regression. Yet, in the light of a recent discussion on IRC, the non-blocking locking doesn't outweight the regression. Therefore it is considered reasonable to get back to use of `Lock`.
  `Lock::Soft` as such remains in place though as it might be useful in
applications where `Lock::Async` cannot serve as a `Lock` replacement due to its specifics.
22:15
rakudo: 1c46805449 | (Vadim Belman)++ (committed using GitHub Web editor) | 9 files
Merge pull request #4934 from vrurg/problem-solving-323-back-to-lock

Get back to using Lock in Stash and CompUnit