#raku-dev on 17 September 2024 - Raku Programming Language Log

03:33 nine_ joined, nine left, camelia left 03:38 camelia joined 07:28 MasterDuke left

|Tux|

Rakudo v2024.08-60-gdde756878 (v6.d) on MoarVM 2024.08-9-g570db2612

csv-ip5xs	0.257	-	0.258
csv-ip5xs-20	1.082	-	1.096
csv-parser	1.467	-	1.483
csv-test-xs-20	0.141	-	0.141
test	1.846	-	1.899
test-t	0.401	-	0.404
test-t --race	0.266	-	0.268
test-t-20	4.776	-	4.804
test-t-20 --race	1.131	-	1.194

08:02

tux.nl/Talks/CSV6/speed4-20.html / tux.nl/Talks/CSV6/speed4.html tux.nl/Talks/CSV6/speed.log

same versions same values

08:03

08:32 sena_kun joined 09:05 sena_kun left

timo

m: say Metamodel::ClassHOW; Metamodel::ClassHOW.gist; Metamodel::ClassHOW.Str;

11:15

camelia

(ClassHOW)
Use of uninitialized value of type Perl6::Metamodel::ClassHOW in string context.
Methods .^name, .raku, .gist, or .say can be used to stringify it to something meaningful.
in block <unit> at <tmp> line 1

timo

m: given Metamodel::ClassHOW { say .Str; say .gist; }

11:16

camelia

Use of uninitialized value of type Perl6::Metamodel::ClassHOW in string context.
Methods .^name, .raku, .gist, or .say can be used to stringify it to something meaningful.

(ClassHOW)
in block at <tmp> line 1

timo

m: given Metamodel::CoercionHOW { say .Str; say .gist; }

camelia

Method Perl6::Metamodel::CoercionHOW.Str not found
in block <unit> at <tmp> line 1

timo

DIHWIDT or LTA?

11:17

gist.github.com/timo/55471f4649415...b85247ce8a

11:25

ParametricRoleHOW, CurriedRoleHOW, Primitives, and EnumHOW are okay with calling .gist on them, Metamodel::Primitives is the only one that likes having .Str called on it

11:26

lizmat

LTA I'd say

11:57

notable6__: weekly

notable6__

lizmat, 1 note: 2024-09-14T16:52:29Z <ab5tract>: weekly - 5ab5traction5.bearblog.dev/introdu...-comma-20/

lizmat

notable6__: weekly reset

notable6__

lizmat, Moved existing notes to “weekly_2024-09-17T11:57:44Z”

timo

i was looking for documentation on COERCE and found no entry for COERCE, and the documentation in docs.raku.org/language/signatures#Coercion_type doesn't mention the ability to define a COERCE method, or that method new is also tried by default

12:04

also, the documentation claims that the method that's called by name on the incoming object doesn't have its return type checked, which doesn't seem correct:

12:05

m: class Gimme { }; class Tester { method Gimme() { "lol" } }; sub test(Gimme() $foo) { say $foo.raku }; test(Tester.new())

12:06

camelia

Impossible coercion from 'Tester' into 'Gimme': method Gimme returned an instance of Str
in sub test at <tmp> line 1
in block <unit> at <tmp> line 1

timo

bisectable6: say 99 ~~ Mu:U

12:19

bisectable6

timo, Will bisect the whole range automagically because no endpoints were provided, hang tight

timo, ¦6c (83 commits): «False␤»

timo, Nothing to bisect!

timo

oops, got that wrong

12:23

m: $_ = 42; say $_ ~~ Mu:U

12:24

camelia

True

timo

m: say $_ ~~ Mu:U

camelia

True

timo

m: say $_ ~~ Any:U

12:25

camelia

True

timo

m: $_ = 42; say $_ ~~ Any:U

camelia

False

timo

bisectable6: $_ = 42; say $_ ~~ Mu:U

bisectable6

timo, Will bisect the whole range automagically because no endpoints were provided, hang tight

timo, Output on all releases: gist.github.com/e974c8ed07bf500c50...237ff70bdf

12:26

timo, Bisecting by output (old=2021.12 new=2022.02) because on both starting points the exit code is 0

lizmat

and yet another Rakudo Weekly News hits the Net: rakudoweekly.blog/2024/09/17/2024-...omma-plug/

12:27

bisectable6

timo, bisect log: gist.github.com/22aefb15fea0bad22a...8571829084