00:12 Pixi left 00:18 Pixi joined 04:37 kurahaupo left, kurahaupo joined 08:22 rba left, rba joined
lizmat m: sub term:<foo>() { "foo" }; sub foo() { 666 }; dd foo # this feels this should bne an err 11:42
evalable6 "foo"
lizmat *be an error
m: sub term:<foo>() { "foo" }; sub foo() { 666 }; dd foo() 11:43
evalable6 666
lizmat *if* there is a zero arg candidate for the sub 11:44
or should we consider this a case of DIHWIDT ? 12:14
timo it occurs to me one could also interpret DIHWIDT as "Damn I Hate When It Does That" 13:25
lizmat I think that could be golfed to: WAT
librasteve_ rakudoweekly.blog/2026/04/27/2026-...lease-192/ 14:38
lizmat librasteve_++ 16:38
m: dd Set[Int].new (|) { :42a } # meh 18:11
evalable6 Bool = Set.new("a")