00:06 iwuvmika left 00:24 shareable6__ joined 00:25 iwuvmika joined, shareable6 left
[Coke] bisectable6: try { CATCH{ ... } ; say 'hi'} 01:45
bisectable6 [Coke], Will bisect the whole range automagically because no endpoints were provided, hang tight
[Coke], Output on all releases: gist.github.com/a932de21e56db1f76f...538438b730 01:46
[Coke], Bisecting by exit code (old=2026.08 new=2026.09). Old exit code: 0
[Coke], bisect log: gist.github.com/81517c5a88a778d822...1d7df5b6b4
[Coke], (2026-09-22) github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/f0...b3348dbcb0
[Coke], Output on all releases and bisected commits: gist.github.com/273f3409ac973f5f31...f7b6076148
[Coke] ^^ legacy didn't require a space after CATCH. bug or now correct? 01:47
01:53 guifa joined 03:43 guifa left 04:19 sivoais left 04:21 sivoais joined 07:09 iwuvmika left
ab5tract Nice catch ;) 07:13
bisectable6: try { supply{…} }; say “hi” 07:15
bisectable6 ab5tract, Will bisect the whole range automagically because no endpoints were provided, hang tight
ab5tract, Output on all releases: gist.github.com/284a7c34c98dd1e505...62350fc64c 07:16
ab5tract, Bisecting by output (old=2024.10 new=2024.12) because on both starting points the exit code is 1
ab5tract, bisect log: gist.github.com/af47fb6b84b83a8d9f...7f8c243cec
ab5tract, (2024-11-22) github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/a9...b4dced35bc
ab5tract, Output on all releases and bisected commits: gist.github.com/3be404b1e8a251ff3c...a83c796c3e
ab5tract I would tend towards “more correct now” but I tend to undervalue backwards compatibility (how hard is it to add a space? Vs How upset will the user be) 07:18
07:20 ShimmerFairy left, ShimmerFairy joined
lizmat rakkable: eco-provides 'sink for' 09:17
rakkable lizmat, Running: eco-provides 'sink for', please be patient!
lizmat, No occurrences found for: eco-provides 'sink for'
lizmat rakkable: eco-provides sink 09:18
rakkable lizmat, Running: eco-provides sink, please be patient!
lizmat, Found 437 lines in 188 files (117 distributions):
lizmat, gist.github.com/dd04b0053bf32b6b0f...9932d555cc
Geth rakudo: uniejo++ created pull request #6896:
Fix quoting of tab and empty arguments for run on Windows
10:07
rakudo/lizmat-107: f80aee5ed3 | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | src/Raku/ast/statementprefixes.rakumod
RakuAST: allow "sink" as a "for" prefix

Turned out all was needed was to mark it allowed.
Also fix some internal documentation, and remove some unnecessary methods (as the base class already provided that).
10:22
rakudo: lizmat++ created pull request #6897:
RakuAST: allow "sink" as a "for" prefix
10:23
lizmat [Coke]: intend to merge ^^ as soon as its CI is green
also probably PR#6896 for that matter 10:25
Geth rakudo/lizmat-108: f06ec14c4d | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | src/Raku/ast/signature.rakumod
RakuAST: remove use of self.IMPL-UNWRAP-LIST

The ::Signature.parameters method wraps the NQP list into a HLL List and then the IMPL-UNWRAP-LIST turns it back into NQP again. As a side-effect, ::Signature.parameters method provides an empty list if no parameters have been specfied, so in that case the for loop would run 0 times. ... (7 more lines)
10:31
rakudo: lizmat++ created pull request #6898:
RakuAST: remove use of self.IMPL-UNWRAP-LIST
rakudo/main: 164a89090e | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ (committed using GitHub Web editor) | src/Raku/ast/statementprefixes.rakumod
RakuAST: allow "sink" as a "for" prefix (#6897)

Turned out all was needed was to mark it allowed.
Also fix some internal documentation, and remove some unnecessary methods (as the base class already provided that).
11:49
ab5tract Does removing the impl wrap list stuff affect the use of RakuAST classes from with Raku code? 12:45
I assume not but thought it worth checking
lizmat it does not... it's just not using the HLL interface internally 2x 12:50
Geth rakudo/main: 27a729a14b | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | src/Raku/ast/rakuast-prologue.nqp
Revert "Add a "note" sub to the RakuAST bootstrap (#6891)"

This reverts commit bba73cdd7bd23cf4c5784c38b1dff809ae197bc1.
Looks like it is not visible inside the Raku bootstrap after all, so remove it. Probably need to re-implement this as a method on RakuAST::Node.
13:07
lizmat meh
13:11 apogee_ntv left 13:13 apogee_ntv joined 13:51 iwuvmika joined 15:58 sjn left 16:53 finanalyst joined 19:07 iwuvmika left 19:20 iwuvmika joined 19:23 sjn joined 21:42 iwuvmika left 22:09 finanalyst left 22:15 iwuvmika joined 22:50 iwuvmika_ joined 22:51 iwuvmika left 22:54 iwuvmika_ is now known as iwuvmika 23:01 iwuvmika_ joined, iwuvmika left 23:04 iwuvmika_ is now known as iwuvmika 23:15 iwuvmika_ joined 23:16 iwuvmika left 23:19 iwuvmika_ is now known as iwuvmika 23:26 iwuvmika left 23:33 guifa joined 23:37 iwuvmika joined 23:54 coleman left 23:55 coleman joined