Documentation Channel for #raku | This channel is logged | Roadmap:
Set by [Coke] on 23 May 2022.
01:02 Kaiepi left 07:53 Kaiepi joined 08:30 sena_kun joined 08:51 sena_kun left
Geth doc: tbrowder++ created pull request #4157:
correct grammar
doc: tbrowder++ created pull request #4158:
fix cross-reference formats
doc: b3cf2ce9be | (Tom Browder)++ | doc/Language/classtut.pod6
correct grammar
doc: 96fcaf2526 | (Will Coleda)++ (committed using GitHub Web editor) | doc/Language/classtut.pod6
Merge pull request #4157 from tbrowder/typo

correct grammar
tbrowder [Coke]: note if my new doc issue is dized, and the two PRs are accepted, it will give me a cleaner file to tell me MY errors for the original "instrospection-example" [sic] PR. that aspell.t UTF-8 error has been there a long time. 12:58
s/dized/fixed/; <= really getting bad.... 13:38
[Coke] I saw the bug for the xt test - was going to see if I could duplicate it on your branch 14:35
One of the two was trivial, done. The other one I needed to actually read.
14:43 NemokoschKiwi joined 14:48 NemokoschKiwi left
[Coke] the remaining one somehow has a conflict already 15:12
tbrowder: the section categories were an issue before you - you don't have to fix those as part of your changes, but thank you if you do. (that's the PR that has a conflict somehow) 15:41
tbrowder okay, thnx, i probably got some overlap in my rush. i’m looking on another host to see if that’s an issue. 16:10
[Coke] regarding your utf8 issue, let me know which branch you're seeing this on 16:12
I can see if it's the branch or the tooling.
(maybe our aspells aren't compatible, e.g.)
tbrowder ok, first item: i see the conflict and can fix it. second item: utf8 i’m looking at another host as well as other branches. 16:23
Geth ¦ doc: coke self-assigned Track Deprecations 18:07
18:46 [Coke] left 18:48 [Coke] joined
[Coke] uhoh, my new network provider just dropped for 4m. 18:50
(they've been great since I switched over until that) 18:51
tbrowder it’s apparently only my one local host with the aspell problem, trying to narrow that down. 20:11
i think i fixed the the git conflict on the fix-xref PR 20:12