|
Documentation Channel for #raku | This channel is logged | Roadmap: github.com/raku/doc/wiki Set by [Coke] on 23 May 2022. |
|||
|
00:00
finanalyst left
00:08
kjp joined
|
|||
| Geth | doc/main: 5604bd8bbc | (Daniel Sockwell)++ | doc/Language/regexes.rakudoc Add ｢…｣, ‘…’, and “…” as Regex syntax |
02:25 | |
| doc: codesections++ created pull request #4397: Replace incorrect use of "currying" with "priming" |
02:30 | ||
|
04:22
kjp left
04:29
kjp joined
04:37
kjp left
04:42
kjp joined
09:16
finanalyst joined
09:42
finanalyst left
10:18
sena_kun joined
|
|||
| [Coke] | lizmat: You OK with the currying/priming change? I hadn't heard priming before. | 14:08 | |
| If so, please feel free to press the button (or I can) | |||
| ah, missed followup chat on PR | 14:29 | ||
| Voldenet | the whole discussion only makes sense if you throw in languages that actually make currying practical because of their type system | 14:43 | |
| so, non-haskell people will call it currying no matter if docs call it that | 14:45 | ||
|
15:36
finanalyst joined
15:38
finanalyst left
15:49
sjn left
15:55
sjn joined
16:49
finanalyst joined
17:03
finanalyst left
17:32
codesections left
17:33
codesections joined
18:26
finanalyst joined
|
|||
| ab5tract_ | right? Is it just a Raku mistake or is this a misnomer that is generally applied by those who don’t really know or care about the distinction between partial function application and currying? | 19:43 | |
| Voldenet | it's the latter and probably a lost battle | 21:12 | |
| like some people consider js promise a monad | |||
|
22:44
finanalyst left
23:23
sena_kun left
|
|||