00:08 Voldenet left 00:35 Voldenet joined 01:02 kjp left 01:04 kjp joined 01:06 kjp left 01:07 kjp joined 01:22 Voldenet left 01:32 Voldenet joined 09:07 sena_kun joined 09:47 [Coke] left 11:43 [Coke] joined
Geth doc/main: 71be59f488 | raiph++ (committed using GitHub Web editor) | doc/Language/regexes.rakudoc
Finish s/`<|w>`/`<?wb>`/ et al in regexes.rakudoc

See github.com/Raku/doc/pull/4435.
I'm not 100% sure this commit will work smoothly as is. One change (or was it two?) involved what looks like meta information related to search indexes. I'm not familiar with that stuff. I did a mechanical translation and guessed it was likely it would work if there was an index entry for `<?wb>`. But maybe I misunderstand. And anyway, I don't know how to test it short of getting into setting up a whole doc testing s
20:07
doc/raiph-patch-2: 4b6d5e0266 | raiph++ (committed using GitHub Web editor) | xt/headings.rakutest
Finish s/`<|w>`/`<?wb>`/ in doc (headings.rakutest)

While `<|w>` works in Rakudo, it isn't official Raku, and while I personally like it, there's a chance it will go away. Its semantics are the same as `<?wb>`, which _is_ official Raku, so I've switched to that. (See also github.com/Raku/doc/commit/5c1a147...fee63efa.)
I meant my prior related commit (which changed the regex doc page) to be a PR because I wasn't 100% sure about the `X<...>` stuff and regardless of that I felt it could still do with a quick check by someone else. But I clicked the wrong button. Otoh, once I'd done that I thought it would almost certainly work and be wanted, and if it didn't it wouldn't be a big deal and would be easy for me to spot it even
But for _this_ change I'm making sure I do it as a PR. I still expect it to work, but it may not, and the consequence of that might be a waste of others' time, and even if it does it might not be wanted.
20:30
doc: raiph++ created pull request #4534:
Finish s/`<|w>`/`<?wb>`/ in doc (headings.rakutest)
22:34 lizmat left 23:00 sena_kun left