01:47 arkiuat left 01:51 arkiuat joined 01:56 arkiuat left 02:10 arkiuat joined 02:15 arkiuat left 02:29 arkiuat joined 02:38 arkiuat left 02:45 arkiuat joined 16:29 librasteve_ joined
arkiuat [Coke], I've made the requested change in github.com/Raku/doc/pull/4723 so it should be ready to go 17:21
17:22 [Coke] left, [Coke] joined
Geth doc/main: 37a1e7e971 | (Eric Forste)++ (committed using GitHub Web editor) | 2 files
Instant, DateTime: discuss leap seconds per issue 3881 (#4723)

  * Instant, DateTime: discuss leap seconds per issue 3881
  * fix rakudoc syntax/format errors
  * nitpicky change of placeholder variable name
  * link all occurrences of C<Instant>
18:32
doc/main: a53b6fe11a | schultzdavid++ (committed using GitHub Web editor) | doc/Type/Telemetry.rakudoc
Document parameters :$heap and $message of Telemetry::snap (#4724)

  * document parameters :$heap and $message of Telemetry::snap
As requested in issue #2905, this documents the parameters :$heap and $message that got introduced for 2019.07 through the commits afc9f84 90e18b6 and 0c80e06 .
  * plural
... (8 more lines)
18:33
doc/main: a10573fe08 | timo++ (committed using GitHub Web editor) | doc/Type/independent-routines.rakudoc
Clarification on &done and &emit (#4721)

emit and done use control exceptions so you don't have to lexically place them inside a react or supply block. Also mention the LAST phaser in whenver blocks is like the done named argument to method tap.
Also, calling &done will return from the supply or react block.
18:58 finanalyst joined
disbot6 <librasteve> arkuiat: I have some concerns about Commit 37a1e7e, please can you check the comments I made here github.com/Raku/doc/commit/37a1e7e971 ... and either apply them or rollback and we can do a more thorough review? 20:55
21:54 lizmat_ joined
arkiuat librasteve, I'll take a look, but github.com/Raku/doc/issues/3881 has just been languishing there for over four years, so let's talk about specific proposed edits to the text that has been approved and merged rather than a rollback? 21:54
I'd love to hear your ideas about how you would address issue 3881. 21:55
21:58 lizmat left
arkiuat I requested suggestions for cuts to this text both here and on #raku several days ago. If you have suggested cuts, they're still welcome. 22:11
[Coke] I don't want to roll that back. Concrete suggestions on improvements are welcome, of course. 22:17
I will say I have seen many times "why is this off by..."
Would you feel better if this section was in Traps, perhaps?
(which brings me to: I don't like traps, and think they should be closer to the primary docs they're addressing) 22:27
disbot6 <librasteve> this discussion has been running 4 years, I have been an active colocutor in the various discussions, the last contribution from me github.com/Raku/problem-solving/issues/497 was to 100% agree with I think the sooner we decouple from it (POSIX) the better. (author Arkuiat). Now in a matter of two days this concensus has been reversed - no attempt to decouple from POSIX has been done and the main view I have 22:32
expressed (ie that for Raku Instant this is an OS level "don't care" now has been released as a long detailed description about how raku Instant suffers from the woes of POSIX timestamps (when in fact Raku design has gone to lengths to avoid this negative association)
<librasteve> so pleae can we do a review that allows for concensus among the interested folks? 22:33
[Coke] raises his hands and lets librasteve own this one. 22:34
Sure, go ahead, revert it.
sorry, arkiuat.
afk
Geth ¦ doc: coke assigned to librasteve Issue Make the role of "leap seconds" more obvious in DateTime and Instant github.com/Raku/doc/issues/3881 22:36
23:03 lizmat_ left, lizmat joined 23:10 Geth left, Geth joined
disbot6 <librasteve> arkuiat, coke: sorry that was unfair and over the top - I know you are keen to make the raku docs better - I sincerely apologise and will try better to be kinder 23:27
23:51 arkiuat left