|
00:09
lizmat left
00:13
arkiuat left
00:17
arkiuat joined
00:22
arkiuat left
00:26
arkiuat joined
00:31
arkiuat left
00:34
arkiuat joined
|
|||
| arkiuat | and by "updated to" I meant "replaced by", so it wouldn't be an additional layer | 00:39 | |
| patrickb | Both App::Prove6 as well as App::Mi6 rely on the TAP module for their testing needs. | 07:09 | |
| App::Mi6 is a collection of different tools about release management, while App::Prove6 is a tool specifically for testing. Thus I'd favor keeping App::Prove6 in the docs about testing. | 07:24 | ||
| disbot11 | <librasteve> like Patrick, I definitely do not see App::Mi6 (module management utility) as anything like a replacement for App::Prove6 (test runner) | 11:01 | |
| lizmat_ | indeed, these are different animals | ||
|
11:01
librasteve_ joined
|
|||
| lizmat_ | hmmm.. looks like there are no roast tests for .WHERE | 11:13 | |
|
11:16
lizmat_ left,
lizmat joined
11:24
arkiuat left
11:25
finanalyst joined
11:31
finanalyst left,
finanalyst joined
11:38
arkiuat joined
11:43
arkiuat left
11:55
arkiuat joined
11:59
arkiuat left
12:20
arkiuat joined
12:44
finanalyst left
14:11
arkiuat left
14:32
arkiuat joined
14:36
librasteve_ left,
arkiuat left
14:37
arkiuat joined
15:17
arkiuat left
|
|||
| lizmat | on docs.raku.org/language/phasers it says: | 15:21 | |
|
15:21
arkiuat joined
|
|||
| lizmat | "Most of these phasers will take either a block or a function reference" | 15:22 | |
| I think the "function reference" part is wrong | |||
| m: sub a() { dd }; BEGIN &a | |||
| camelia | ( no output ) | ||
| lizmat | does not actually run the "a" sub | ||
| m: sub a() { dd }; BEGIN a | |||
| camelia | sub a() | ||
| lizmat | does, but that's just because "a" is a thunk here | ||
| related: although thunk is explained in the glossary: docs.raku.org/language/glossary#Thunk | 15:24 | ||
| it might be an idea to more prominently use that in the documentation | 15:28 | ||
|
15:28
arkiuat left
15:29
arkiuat joined
|
|||
| patrickb | examples would help for the thunk explanation. | 15:42 | |
| is the body of an "if" a think? | 15:43 | ||
| *thunk | |||
|
16:15
finanalyst joined
16:34
arkiuat left
|
|||
| lizmat | I'd say: yes | 16:35 | |
| m: if my $a = 42 { }; say $a | |||
| camelia | 42 | ||
|
16:48
arkiuat joined
16:53
arkiuat left
17:04
librasteve_ joined
17:21
arkiuat joined
17:25
arkiuat left
17:38
arkiuat joined
18:43
arkiuat left
18:57
arkiuat joined
19:01
arkiuat left
19:05
arkiuat joined
19:10
arkiuat left
19:40
arkiuat joined
19:45
arkiuat left
20:06
arkiuat joined
20:11
arkiuat left
20:40
arkiuat joined
21:44
arkiuat left
21:56
finanalyst left,
arkiuat joined
22:05
arkiuat left
22:07
arkiuat joined
22:12
arkiuat left
22:39
arkiuat joined
22:44
arkiuat left
23:08
arkiuat joined
23:13
arkiuat left
23:17
arkiuat joined
|
|||