|
06:30
samebchase left
07:43
lizmat left
08:53
samebchase joined
09:59
librasteve_ left
13:16
lizmat joined
|
|||
| Geth | doc/raiph-patch-2: 47a7015255 | raiph++ (committed using GitHub Web editor) | doc/Type/Instant.rakudoc Revise Instant class documentation for clarity Updated the documentation for the Instant class, including changes to the title, subtitle, and descriptions of characteristics and methods. Clarified the definitions and added notes regarding accuracy and precision. Eliminated direct mention of an epoch. |
13:44 | |
| doc: raiph++ created pull request #4797: Puli Proposal for revision of Instant class documentation |
13:57 | ||
|
20:01
librasteve_ joined
21:11
arkiuat joined
|
|||
| arkiuat | [Coke]: I've reviewed github.com/Raku/doc/pull/4777 | 21:19 | |
| I think it's a definite improvement and should be merged. The author was quite careful about changing exactly one aspect: changing all references to "evaluation order" (with its unfortunate implications about side effects) to references to parse structure. | 21:21 | ||
| [Coke] | cool; go for it! | 21:22 | |
| arkiuat | Also, I'd like to move github.com/Raku/doc/issues/4608 from the Q1 milestone to Q2: there have been developments on the linked problem-solving issue, and I'm about to leave town for two weeks and probably won't be able to work on it again much until mid-April | 21:23 | |
| okay, will do. Should I squash-merge it? | 21:24 | ||
| yeah I'll do that | |||
| oh wait, or should I rebase? | 21:25 | ||
| also, I think PR 4777 closes issue github.com/Raku/doc/issues/4058 | 21:27 | ||
| oh yeah, the authorof 4777 said that up front. So I'll the issue after I merge the PR | 21:28 | ||
| s/I'll the/I'll close the/ | |||
| Geth | doc/main: 551276a026 | (Márton Polgár)++ (committed using GitHub Web editor) | doc/Language/operators.rakudoc Precedence and associativity vs "evaluation order" (#4777) * rewrite precedence and associativity story from evaluation order to syntactic structure Mostly by talking about which operator a certain operand "belongs to", not what part is "evaluated first", also drawing parallels with parenthesizing subexpressions. * fix thinko * fix leftover extraneous negation |
21:31 | |
| arkiuat | oh cool, the author's wording was enough make it autoclose the issue | 21:32 | |
| [Coke] | If you include "Closes #xxxx" in the commit message, or "fixes #..." github will close the issue | 21:39 | |
| arkiuat | right. In this case I didn't even have to because marton put "resolve #xxxx" in the initial comment on the PR, and that was enough to engage the autocloser | 21:46 | |
| I went ahead with the milestone change and left a comment explaining | |||
| [Coke] | thanks | 21:49 | |
|
22:11
librasteve_ left
22:40
arkiuat left
22:53
arkiuat joined
22:58
arkiuat left
22:59
arkiuat joined
23:03
arkiuat left
|
|||