| [Coke] | the glossary entry for Virtual Machine could be cleaned up (at least to remove parrot) | 00:06 | |
| tbrowder | i just looked at docs for defining a new Date and didn’t notice the new, cool way of doing: my $d = Date.now without the parens. Also this works now: my $year = Date.now.year | 00:53 | |
| o | |||
|
01:59
librasteve_ left
02:03
arkiuat left
02:08
arkiuat joined
02:12
arkiuat left
02:19
arkiuat joined
02:28
arkiuat left
02:47
arkiuat joined
02:51
arkiuat left
03:14
arkiuat joined
03:23
arkiuat left
03:35
arkiuat joined
|
|||
| jubilatious1_98524 | @tbrowder_04810 Didn't that used to be my $d .= Date.new(); witht he .= operator? | 03:37 | |
|
03:40
arkiuat left
04:00
arkiuat joined
04:04
arkiuat left
04:34
arkiuat joined
04:39
arkiuat left
04:56
[Coke]_ joined
04:59
lizmat_ joined
05:01
[Coke]__ joined,
arkiuat joined
05:04
[Coke] left
05:05
lizmat left,
[Coke]_ left
05:06
arkiuat left
05:38
arkiuat joined
05:47
arkiuat left
06:03
arkiuat joined
06:12
arkiuat left
06:24
arkiuat joined
06:33
arkiuat left
06:46
arkiuat joined
06:51
arkiuat left
07:03
wayland76 joined
07:04
arkiuat joined
07:11
arkiuat left
07:40
arkiuat joined
07:45
arkiuat left
08:13
arkiuat joined
08:18
arkiuat left
08:45
arkiuat joined
08:49
arkiuat left
09:15
lizmat_ left,
lizmat joined
09:17
arkiuat joined
09:22
arkiuat left
09:40
arkiuat joined
09:45
arkiuat left
10:13
arkiuat joined
10:19
arkiuat left
10:41
arkiuat joined
10:47
arkiuat left
11:05
arkiuat joined
11:10
arkiuat left
11:30
arkiuat joined
11:35
arkiuat left
11:36
ds7832 joined
11:48
arkiuat joined
11:53
arkiuat left
11:54
librasteve_ joined
12:00
arkiuat joined
12:11
arkiuat left
12:23
arkiuat joined
12:27
arkiuat left
12:40
[Coke]__ is now known as [Coke]
|
|||
| [Coke] | m: 1.put | 12:44 | |
| camelia | 1 | ||
|
12:57
arkiuat joined
13:02
arkiuat left
13:20
arkiuat joined
13:34
arkiuat left
13:43
arkiuat joined
13:47
arkiuat left
13:53
Guest7085 joined
14:06
arkiuat joined
14:11
arkiuat left
14:12
Guest7085 left
14:21
arkiuat joined
15:11
arkiuat left
15:23
arkiuat joined
15:28
arkiuat left
15:43
arkiuat joined
17:41
arkiuat_ joined
17:43
coleman_ joined
17:50
arkiuat left,
coleman left,
coleman_ is now known as coleman
17:52
arkiuat_ is now known as arkiuat
|
|||
| arkiuat | looking docs.raku.org/type/Any#method_duckmap is there some transition missing in the paragraph that begins with "In the second case," and ends with "In this case:" ? | 17:54 | |
| Or is it just me and I'm missing something? | 17:55 | ||
| [Coke] | if I were scanning it, it would read the same as if ". In this case" were removed, but after reading it a few times, I'm not sure the example after that is another example of that behavior | 18:04 | |
| maybe check git history to see if someone accidentally elided some text? | |||
| arkiuat | that's just what I was thinking of doing; thanks for confirming | 18:08 | |
| I didn't want to start digging if it was just a hallucination on my part | 18:09 | ||
| Nope, it looks as if that whole passage through to the end of the entry is exactly as it first appeared on 2018-05-07 when JJ extended the duckmap definition. Hasn't been touched since then. | 18:19 | ||
| s/definition/explanation/ | 18:20 | ||
| so JJ might have accidentally elided something from his own draft, but that's just speculation | 18:21 | ||
| [Coke] | Add it to the pile, I guess. | ||
| arkiuat | yeah, i was just trying to do the Issue 4560 thing. Even before I got to that part, I was thinking it might need to be rewritten because doubling every example of use as a method with the same, but used as a sub, leaves a rather unwieldy result | 18:24 | |
| but yeah, rewriting the explanation of duckmap probably needs its own issue. I'll finish making it unwieldy first and then file that | 18:26 | ||
| Geth | doc: arkiuat++ created pull request #4710: type/Any#duckmap: changing method to routine |
18:53 | |
| arkiuat | also made issue github.com/Raku/doc/issues/4711 | 19:15 | |
| Geth | doc/main: 2676b46f7d | (Eric Forste)++ (committed using GitHub Web editor) | doc/Type/Any.rakudoc type/Any#duckmap: changing method to routine (#4710) * changing method to routine for duckmap Part of #4560 * correcting return type for deepmap |
19:22 | |
|
19:27
librasteve_ left
19:49
arkiuat left
19:51
arkiuat joined
19:56
arkiuat left
20:11
arkiuat joined
|
|||
| lizmat | docs.raku.org/language/operators#infix_Z versus docs.raku.org/language/operators#Z...taoperator | 20:55 | |
| I do think they are the same thing, infix:<Z> is just short for infix:<Z,> or am I missing something ? | 20:56 | ||
| arkiuat | well, that doesn't sound like the same thing to me, since one is a metaoperator and the other is an application of that metaoperator to C<,> but certainly the doc for infix:<Z> should mention up front that it's just short for C<Z,> | 21:12 | |
| pardon my inconsistent notation | 21:13 | ||
|
22:04
wayland76 left
23:30
arkiuat left
23:37
arkiuat joined
23:41
arkiuat left
23:44
arkiuat joined
23:49
arkiuat left
|
|||