| gcd | No one has to like the paperclip factory, but pretending the world is going back to loose leaf isn't a strategy. | 00:01 | |
|
00:04
Sgeo left
|
|||
| timo | i'm not going to re-tread all the arguments that i've already spent way too many words on in that moarvm issue | 00:13 | |
|
00:24
Sgeo joined
|
|||
| timo | meanwhile i'm going to keep pretending that the entire global banking system hasn't been annihilated and replaced with cryptocurrencies | 00:27 | |
|
00:46
[Coke] left
00:54
Sgeo left
01:10
Sgeo joined
01:50
kylese left
01:51
kylese joined
02:15
kylese left,
kylese joined
02:42
[Coke] joined
|
|||
| samebchase | Thanks for all your efforts timo 🙏🏽 | 03:12 | |
|
05:40
abraxxa joined
06:12
Sgeo left
06:52
gfldex left
07:19
gfldex joined
07:48
dakkar joined
10:29
lizmat left,
lizmat joined
|
|||
| disbot | <aruniecrisps> @timo is there some way to contact you? I have an idea | 10:38 | |
| lizmat | aruniecrisps if you hop on IRC, you can privmsg with timo | 10:39 | |
| disbot | <melezhik.> So I am using my free groq credits to generate dsci pipeline for typical Raku layout ( including test coverage) - dsci.sparrowhub.io:8080/report/ui2/job.run/2078 @antononcube you may take interest in this / or anyony willing to play with dsci . openai/gpt-oss-120b is pretty accurate , besides some minor glitches , and it takes only 7 secs to generate ! | 10:57 | |
| <melezhik.> And this may become a party of dsci offering out of the box | 10:58 | ||
| <melezhik.> Here is what I am asking for : “You are an expert DevOps assistant specialized in DSCI (Dead Simple CI). DSCI replaces complex CI/CD YAML with a tiny, high-level structural YAML file (jobs.yaml) and executes all actual logic using standard Bash or Raku in jobs (job.raku/job.bash) and tasks (task.bash/task.raku)” | 10:59 | ||
| <melezhik.> Generate a DSCI pipeline configuration for: project written on Rakulang - The source code of the project will be commited later. - Pipeline should test, build and push code as image to container registry - Test stage should run unit tests using prove6 cli - Prove6 should be installed before using zef install App::Prove6 command | 11:00 | ||
| <aruniecrisps> Thanks @lizmat | 11:06 | ||
| tbrowder | timo, esp. thanks for fixing JSON::Fast, aa | 12:12 | |
| as well as all the other things. mine sharing why you're leaving and where you're going? | 12:13 | ||
| [Coke] | tbrowder: I believe it is primarily around github.com/MoarVM/MoarVM/issues/2015 | 12:18 | |
| tbrowder | ah, yes, thnx | 12:37 | |
|
12:45
atcroft left
|
|||
| [Coke] | folks - thoughts on how to do a soft pre-release appreciated. As we get closer to flipping the switch for RakuAST to be the default, we'll need a bunch of folks testing that aren't the core developers+Blin | 12:49 | |
| If we can figure out a clean way to put a -rc-ast-1 version in the pipeline and get native builds for it, that'd be nice. (but we'd have to be careful it didn't get picked up as the latest version by folks) | 12:51 | ||
|
13:01
Pixi` joined
13:04
Pixi left
13:08
atweedie left,
eax_ left,
pierrot left,
atweedie joined
13:09
eax_ joined
13:14
pierrot joined
|
|||
| disbot | <antononcube> Here is a brainstorming question: > What would be the rakubrew command for a "soft pre-release"? | 13:41 | |
| <antononcube> To put it another way, can I specify to rakubrew do I want to see/download RakuAST distributions or not? | 13:43 | ||
| ugexe | so long, and thanks for all the fish | 14:34 | |
| [Coke] | for rakubrew, we could have people do a build of a specific commit. | ||
| tbrowder | woul | 14:52 | |
| erg, i will try to help on my old laptop | 14:53 | ||
| but i'm not using rakubrew, just the old fasioned way | 14:54 | ||
| disbot | <melezhik.> @antononcube now markdown generated by LLM is rendered - dsci.sparrowhub.io:8080/file_view/d.../answer.md for readability | 15:26 | |
| ugexe | no offense but it seems a bit tone deaf to mention all this LLM stuff today given that someone not even 12 hours ago posted here that they are leaving the raku project because of genai | 15:31 | |
| timo | don't worry, I'm adopting a "not my circus, not my monkeys" attitude and trying to just laugh it off | 15:36 | |
| disbot | <melezhik.> ugexe: dsci itself is written by me , without LLM. LLM is just an excellent tool to attract new users to any ( Raku ) related projects , whats wrong with that ? People could use LLM baked feature to bootstrap pipelines … | ||
| <melezhik.> I myself never consider LLM is evil if one uses it properly | 15:37 | ||
|
15:39
[Coke] left
|
|||
| tbrowder | amen | 15:39 | |
|
15:40
[Coke] joined,
[Coke] left
|
|||
| tbrowder | and test well | 15:40 | |
| ugexe | because no one really cares about the llm part | ||
| disbot | <melezhik.> Btw if you please point me the ref to this 12 hours ago post ? Ooc | ||
| <melezhik.> Well that’s the point - people cares about results which LLM gives them | 15:41 | ||
| ugexe | yes, so why lead with how much you spent on grok or whatever | ||
| disbot | <melezhik.> Cause I use LLM to generate ( of good quality in my case ) code and probably going to make this LLM backed feature part of dsci , and hopefully this will attract more users and eventually new users to Raku , cause dsci ci engine is written on it | 15:45 | |
| ugexe | why do you think people care about the llm part of what you just said? | ||
| no one is seeing llm generated code and saying "oh it is interesting that llm generated that" | |||
| people are interested in results sure, but that is different than glorifying the method used to get there | 15:46 | ||
| disbot | <melezhik.> Cause they just do 😊 cause LLM is the future whether we want it or not. But I am against bad use or f LLM like vibe coding and stuff | ||
| <melezhik.> And I am fire good use of LLM | |||
| <melezhik.> Fire -> for | 15:47 | ||
| ugexe | i think you're missing my point | ||
| disbot | <melezhik.> What’s wrong with method ? What’s wrong with saying - the method is good is the one provides the good ? | 15:48 | |
| <vendethiel> sad day for the Raku project | |||
| ugexe | do you think people would find it interesting if you mentioned "i used vscode to write this code"? | 15:49 | |
| disbot | <melezhik.> No. But LLM is not vscode | ||
| ugexe | for the sake of the argument im making the comparison is apt. yes obviously thing A is not thing B | 15:52 | |
| disbot | <melezhik.> Ugexe: I would rather avoid the discussion , I can try to avoid LLM related messages here if this bothers you but I just don’t get why. There is tons of code I believe generated by LLM which is really bad and I am realistic about that. But also there is good ( at least for my purposes ) code which is produced by LLM as well | ||
| <melezhik.> And if it’s good I am just sharing . That’s it ) | 15:54 | ||
|
15:56
[Coke] joined
|
|||
| tadzik | I am now curious if there are cases where (advertised) LLM use attracts someone to a project. I've seen plenty of data points for the opposite, but it may be just my bubble | 16:24 | |
|
16:37
dakkar left
|
|||
| disbot | <melezhik.> Oh, I just read about timo decision . Very sad 😔, by no means I want trigger any sort of disturbance here by referencing LLM in this chat . But fundamentally I personally do consider LLM is evil , it just need proper usage and wisdom | 16:45 | |
| <antononcube> Thanks for bringing this up -- I missed it. | 16:58 | ||
| <melezhik.> Do consider -> do not consider. Sorry for the typo | 17:01 | ||
| <antononcube> Facilitating creation of LLM pipelines and making LLM / AI agents. Having LLMs at your fingertip in interactive sessions. | 17:02 | ||
|
17:04
human-blip left
17:06
human-blip joined
|
|||
| disbot | <antononcube> To repeat and exaggerate a point made by others -- to ignore LLMs and the use of LLMs in programming is simply stupid. | 17:07 | |
| <antononcube> I also agree that the use LLMs can be turn off -- there are (at least) a dozen of Raku packages that are obviously written by AI-agents, and, because of that, I completely not interested trying them out or using them | 17:09 | ||
| <antononcube> Mostly, because I have doubts they are well designed. I.e. why spent time and efforts adopting some AI slop... | 17:11 | ||
| tadzik | "simply stupid?" | 17:20 | |
| aside of the tongue-in-cheek "stupid because if you ignore them then you won't notice that you're adopting slop", I'm curious what you mean by that | 17:21 | ||
| disbot | <antononcube> I will give examples. | 17:33 | |
| <melezhik.> ugexe: would I have known the news I’d be more careful in sharing this LLM stuff , sorry for that . Did not want to upset you | 17:48 | ||
|
18:48
abraxxa left,
abraxxa joined
18:52
abraxxa left,
abraxxa joined
|
|||
| tbrowder | antononcube i welcome your analysis of my latest module to see if i’m wasting my time: App::RakuDocToPDG | 19:17 | |
| or your time | 19:18 | ||
| er PDF | 19:28 | ||
| disbot | <antononcube> 🤔 | 19:38 | |
|
20:54
abraxxa left
21:15
rantanplan left
21:17
snonux joined
|
|||
| tbrowder | module is App::RakuDocToPDF (pardon my bad typing) | 22:42 | |
|
23:11
Sgeo joined
|
|||
| lucs | I think I don't understand the ratchet attribute. | 23:33 | |
| m: '4a2ab' ~~ /:r (\d) 'a' 'b'/; say ~$0; # Shouldn't this fail? | 23:34 | ||
| camelia | 2 | ||
|
23:49
kjp left
23:56
vasko45355861 joined
|
|||