š¦ Welcome to the MAIN() IRC channel of the Raku Programming Language (raku.org). Log available at irclogs.raku.org/raku/live.html . If you're a beginner, you can also check out the #raku-beginner channel! Set by lizmat on 6 September 2022. |
|||
00:00
sena_kun left
00:03
dbonnafo joined
00:08
dbonnafo left
00:15
derpydoo left
00:41
jpn joined
00:46
jpn left
00:55
AlexDaniel left
01:00
HobGoblin joined,
bloatable6 left,
bloatable6 joined
01:01
goblin left
01:08
nebuchadnezzar left
01:48
Dama joined
01:54
Dama left
02:05
jpn joined
02:10
kylese left,
hulk joined
02:12
jpn left
02:33
jpn joined
02:38
human-blip left
02:39
jpn left,
human-blip joined
02:42
andinus left
02:43
andinus joined
02:59
JRaspass left
03:00
JRaspass joined
03:16
jpn joined
03:21
jpn left
03:33
hythm joined
03:41
eof left
03:42
summerisle joined
|
|||
hythm | calling `.d` on a symlink file that points to a directory returns True. is this correct behavior? | 04:03 | |
`raku -e 'say "symlink".IO.d'` # True | 04:04 | ||
04:05
dbonnafo joined,
avar left,
avar joined
|
|||
MasterDuke | it matches perl. `perl -E 'say -d "symlink"'Ā # 1` | 04:06 | |
hythm | I ask because that cause logic likeĀ `.rmdir if .d` to fail with `Failed to rmdir: not a directory` | 04:09 | |
04:09
edr left,
dbonnafo left
04:11
xelxebar left,
xelxebar joined
04:18
jpn joined
04:22
tinita left,
tinita joined,
jpn left
04:57
hythm left
05:12
CIAvash joined
05:14
jdv left,
jdv joined
05:19
jpn joined
05:20
BinGOs left,
bingos joined
05:23
jpn left
05:42
dbonnafo joined
05:49
esh left,
esh joined
05:55
bd3i left,
bd3i joined
05:59
gfldex left,
gfldex joined
06:02
tea3po left
06:07
dbonnafo left,
GreaseMonkey left,
dbonnafo joined,
greaser|q joined
06:13
SmokeMachine left,
SmokeMachine joined
06:19
CIAvash left
06:20
jpn joined
06:21
CIAvash joined
06:22
CIAvash left
06:24
jpn left
06:25
perlmaros left,
perlmaros joined
06:26
pat_js left
06:27
pat_js joined
06:42
jtza8 joined,
jtza8 left,
jtza8 joined
06:48
lizmat_ joined,
RakuIRCLogger left
06:50
Geth left,
lizmat left
06:51
Geth joined
07:00
sivoais joined
07:01
jpn joined
07:05
jpn left
07:11
xinming left
07:13
xinming joined,
constxqt left
07:28
ilogger2 joined
07:33
nebuchadnezzar joined
07:50
hexology joined
07:59
dbonnafo joined
08:15
jpn joined
08:17
RakuIRCLogger joined
08:18
lizmat_ left,
lizmat joined
08:20
jpn left
08:22
jpn joined
08:23
jpn joined
08:30
abraxxa joined
08:35
jpn left
08:50
[dpk] joined
|
|||
ab5tract | m: use NativeCall; my Pointer[int32] $p = Pointer[int32].new(42); dd $p # how are you actually supposed to do this? | 08:51 | |
camelia | Type check failed in assignment to $p; expected NativeCall::Types::Pointer[int32] but got NativeCall::Types::Pointer (NativeCall::Types::P...) in block <unit> at <tmp> line 1 |
||
08:51
dpk left
08:54
dakkar joined
08:55
bingos is now known as BinGOs,
jpn joined
08:59
samebchase left
09:01
samebchase joined
|
|||
nemokosch | > calling .d on a symlink file that points to a directory returns True. is this correct behavior? | 09:01 | |
I don't know if it is correct but I can definitely recall the topic | |||
there might even be an issue for it, idk if you checked hythm | 09:02 | ||
09:06
jpn left
09:17
Sgeo left
|
|||
leont | Yes that is correct behavior. | 09:26 | |
nemokosch | github.com/rakudo/rakudo/issues/5345 | 09:27 | |
09:30
camelia left,
sena_kun joined
09:35
amenonsen left
09:36
amenonsen joined
10:10
abraxxa left
10:13
El_Che left,
El_Che joined
10:21
abraxxa joined
10:29
mark22k left
10:31
mark22k joined
10:43
jpn joined
10:52
sena_kun left,
sena_kun joined
10:54
PotatoGim left,
jpn left
10:55
PotatoGim joined
11:02
[dpk] is now known as dpk
11:06
renormalist left,
renormalist joined
11:08
rba left,
rba joined
11:23
lucerne left
11:24
lucerne joined
11:38
jpn joined
11:43
jpn left
11:53
leont left,
leont joined
12:06
jpn joined
12:10
jpn left
12:23
melezhik joined
|
|||
melezhik | . | 12:23 | |
getting rakudo.org/dl/rakudo/rakudo-moar-2...gcc.tar.gz is EXTREMELY slow for me - gist.github.com/melezhik/95eb50a6d...f2487c2890 | 12:24 | ||
cc andinus coleman | |||
12:26
melezhik left
12:30
abraxxa1 joined
12:32
abraxxa left
12:45
jpn joined
|
|||
Geth | ecosystem/SUPERSEDING: dc5d7934ea | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | SUPERSEDING.list First stab at providing superseds mapping This contains all of my modules that lived on PAUSE at some point. Each line is supposed to consist of two or more "words". The first word is the original module:auth<ā¦> string, and the next words are the module:auth<ā¦> strings that superseded the previous module:auth<ā¦>. ... (5 more lines) |
12:49 | |
12:50
jpn left
|
|||
Geth | ecosystem: lizmat++ created pull request #628: Provide community maintained supersedes mapping |
12:50 | |
ecosystem/main: dc5d7934ea | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | SUPERSEDING.list First stab at providing superseds mapping This contains all of my modules that lived on PAUSE at some point. Each line is supposed to consist of two or more "words". The first word is the original module:auth<ā¦> string, and the next words are the module:auth<ā¦> strings that superseded the previous module:auth<ā¦>. ... (5 more lines) |
12:53 | ||
ecosystem/main: 7f1d82d271 | (Juan JuliĆ”n Merelo GuervĆ³s)++ (committed using GitHub Web editor) | SUPERSEDING.list Merge pull request #628 from Raku/SUPERSEDING Provide community maintained supersedes mapping |
|||
ugexe | yeah im not a fan of that | 13:03 | |
lizmat | of the idea, or the quick merge ? | 13:04 | |
ugexe | it deserves a problem-solving at the very least | ||
lizmat | well, that's why I made it a PR, so we could discuss it | ||
I'll revert and re-open the PR,, ok ? | |||
ugexe | i think its better as a problem solving issue | ||
lizmat | ok, I'll open that | 13:05 | |
ugexe | like there is a problem solving repo to get rid of the Foo:ver<xxx> parsing among other things | ||
but it also makes reasoning about what will get downloaded quite difficult | 13:06 | ||
lizmat | github.com/Raku/problem-solving/issues/394 you mean? | ||
ugexe | versions would be effectively pointless as one can use whatever they want as long as they add it to that list | 13:07 | |
i'm just having a hard idea finding what it solves that using a single ecosystem and version/api/auth doesnt solve | |||
lizmat | well, I would be against forcing to a single ecosystem | 13:08 | |
it stifles progress | |||
ugexe | its not forced | 13:09 | |
but a single ecosystem is the secure way, and being secure by default is what every other ecosystem is moving towards | |||
i'd be interested to hear how it stifles progress as well | |||
lizmat | if we wouldn't have allowed multiple ecosystems, PAUSE or zef ecosystems would have never existed | 13:11 | |
ugexe | you are confusing allowing multiple ecosystems to what is used as a default | 13:12 | |
lizmat | ah, you mean that the default setting for zef should be zef ecosystem only, and not look at the REA, CPAN or p6c ? | 13:13 | |
ugexe | it should be an ecosystem that applies policy to namespaces, and zef ecosystem is the only one of those that does that, so yes | 13:14 | |
lizmat | understood | ||
ugexe | but no secure ecosystem can work cooroporatively with another unsecure ecosystem | ||
lizmat | ack | ||
ugexe | including trying to force how the resolution happens | ||
like mapping one auth to another | 13:15 | ||
lizmat | with regards to keeping supersedes information: do I understand your problem of my ecosystem PR is the format, not the idea? | ||
ugexe | there are problems with the idea as is as well | 13:16 | |
lizmat | ? | ||
ugexe | notably but no secure ecosystem can work cooroporatively with another unsecure ecosystem | ||
or rather, a secure ecosystem working cooperatively with an unsecure ecosystem makes them both unsecure | 13:17 | ||
lizmat | having the supersedes list community maintained makes it insecure ? | 13:18 | |
ugexe | does it mix and match between ecosystems? | 13:19 | |
lizmat | that's the idea ? | ||
ugexe | like i wish you would take a little bit to think of what could be wrong with this, because in my eyes there are so many issues that it seems hard to believe any have been considered | ||
yes im saying that idea is insecure | 13:20 | ||
like if i pin something to a specific auth/ver/api i want those specific things | |||
13:22
jetchisel left,
jetchisel joined
|
|||
ugexe | implementing supercedes in the core per s22 could be a step in that direction. it would require much more work to get going, but it is also a more appropriate way of handling this | 13:23 | |
lizmat | funny you should say that :-) | ||
as I wrote most of that almost 10 years ago now :-) | 13:24 | ||
ugexe | yeah, i often laugh at how much smarter i used to be 10 years ago than i am today | 13:25 | |
nemokosch | š | ||
lizmat | the problem with the idea in S22 is that any author can put a "supersedes" in their META6.json | 13:26 | |
ugexe | yeah, but that is kind of the point | ||
you can put bad stuff in there sure, but a secure ecosystem wouldn't allow that | 13:27 | ||
lizmat | that's why I like the idea of a community maintained listr | ||
ugexe | community defined resolution order just does not seem like a good thin got me | ||
lizmat | how would a secure ecosystem know not to allow a "supersedes" ? | ||
ugexe | its really not difficult i dont think | 13:29 | |
13:29
jpn joined
|
|||
ugexe | if someone tries to supersedes a module/distribution that isn't theres, well, it should by default reject it. that is an oversimplification since you could have admin tools to eventually approve it or some such | 13:29 | |
13:30
drakonis left
|
|||
lizmat | how would it determine it is't theirs ? | 13:31 | |
13:31
drakonis joined
|
|||
lizmat | who would watch the people doing the admin tools ? | 13:31 | |
ugexe | thats an exercise left to the reader, but there could very easily be ways | ||
as a naive example the zef ecosystem could see if the auth matches | 13:32 | ||
lizmat | yeah, but that's not a common use case | 13:33 | |
the common use case is modules moving from p6c / CPAN to zef | |||
how would it match that ? | |||
ugexe | again, an exercise for the reader. thinking about it for 10 seconds i think "every rando dashboard can prove i own a given domain" | 13:34 | |
so having a user upload something to their cpan for example to prove they own it | |||
lizmat | that won't work for p6c | 13:35 | |
ugexe | that might just have to be too bad | ||
lizmat | also: I don't want to upload anything to PAUSE anymore, like ever | ||
Geth | ecosystem/SUPERSEDING: e846162797 | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | SUPERSEDING.list It appears to be a bad idea |
13:36 | |
tbrowder__ | latest Tiobe shows Perl at 29 and no Raku in top 100 | ||
nemokosch | for what it's worth, supersedes within the zef ecosystem could (should) get pretty common | ||
usually not for the same author though, that would defeat the purpose | |||
ugexe | ok, but should we design supersedes around the fact you dont want to upload anything to pause anymore? like i agree it sucks but if we are targeting the common use case and not an individual use case then it would be fine | 13:37 | |
lizmat | well, that was the whole idea of "superseded-by" | ||
anyways, I think I'm going to recuse myself from this | 13:38 | ||
tbrowder__ | if i were emperor, raku.land would ignore all but zef archive | ||
ugexe | but superseded-by would have required you upload it to cpan | ||
lizmat | indeed at one point I would have done that | 13:39 | |
ugexe | superseded-by is admittedly a bit strange in that regard though | ||
lizmat | why? it allows an author to indicate they've given up on a module (whether completely, or in a given ecosystem) | ||
ugexe | like by the time you know you want it to be superseded-by something, it is probably already released an in an ecosystem | 13:40 | |
tbrowder__ | at least ignore those outside zef by the "same" author | ||
13:40
jpn left
|
|||
lizmat | tbrowder__: determining what is "the same author" is basically what's being discussed here | 13:41 | |
ugexe | actually i guess superseded-by still kind of makes sense like that... author would just release their final version that includes it | ||
lizmat | that was the idea, yes | ||
ugexe | right. i was thinking of it more like the SUPERCEDING list thing which would effectively inject supersedes into previous releases | 13:42 | |
nemokosch | sometimes it shouldn't even be "the same author" though | ||
tbrowder__ | jjatria and i are discussing same | 13:44 | |
Geth | ecosystem/main: 8c3c3bf82d | (Elizabeth Mattijsen)++ | SUPERSEDING.list It appears to be a bad idea (now in the right branch) |
13:45 | |
13:46
jpn joined
|
|||
ugexe | i also suppose if superceded-by was implementing in the core (in META6.json) that we are still small enough to do manual reviews of what would be theoretically rejected by a secure ecosystem | 13:48 | |
i.e. we know lizmat actually owns those cpan distributions, so they could just be marked as allowed | |||
then again we can't upload a auth: cpan:foo to zef ecosystem in the first place, so maybe not | 13:49 | ||
nemokosch | I tend to like this "depends in hash form" suggestion, too | 13:51 | |
13:51
jpn left
|
|||
ugexe | could make a good squash-a-thon or whatever (sending PRs changing depends to hash form) | 13:53 | |
lizmat returns to regularly scheduled hacking | 13:59 | ||
14:02
itaipu left
14:03
itaipu joined
14:06
leedo left,
leedo joined,
jtza8 left
14:11
jpn joined
|
|||
lizmat clickbaits rakudoweekly.blog/2023/11/13/2023-...proaching/ | 14:16 | ||
14:25
abraxxa1 left
14:28
jpn left
14:32
jpn joined
14:34
ilogger2 left,
ilogger2_ joined
14:49
atweedie left,
atweedie joined
14:56
jpn left
15:06
clarkema left,
clarkema joined
16:02
[Coke] left,
[Coke] joined
16:12
abraxxa joined
16:24
ugexe left,
ugexe joined
16:31
AlexDaniel joined
16:33
Woodi left,
Woodi joined
16:37
constxqt joined
16:42
AlexDaniel left
16:54
grondilu joined,
grondilu left
17:13
jpn joined
17:19
jpn left
17:20
jpn joined,
abraxxa left
17:31
dakkar left
17:32
mtj left,
mtj joined
17:43
MasterDuke left,
kjp left,
abraxxa joined,
kjp joined
17:51
guifa_ left
17:52
guifa joined
18:04
corwin left,
corwin joined
18:29
jpn left
18:33
jpn joined
18:43
edr joined
19:11
thebb left,
thebb joined
19:13
snonux left,
snonux joined
19:30
melezhik joined
|
|||
melezhik | .tell tonyo I have an issue with publish distribution with zef over SparrowCI - github.com/tony-o/raku-fez/issues/117 | 19:31 | |
tellable6 | melezhik, I'll pass your message to tonyo | ||
19:32
sena_kun left
19:36
melezhik left
19:41
nine left
19:42
nine joined
|
|||
tonyo | melezhik: can you update fez and try again? it should tell you what the missing prompt is on the latest version github.com/tony-o/raku-fez/blob/ma...akumod#L25 | 20:05 | |
tellable6 | tonyo, I'll pass your message to melezhik | ||
20:11
jpn left
20:15
dg left
20:16
dg joined
20:19
dbonnafo_ joined
20:21
dbonnafo left
20:28
buffet left
20:29
dbonnafo joined
20:30
buffet joined,
dbonnafo_ left
20:54
jpn joined
21:06
jpn left
21:11
jpn joined
21:30
abraxxa left
|
|||
ugexe | my guess is it has to be github.com/tony-o/raku-fez/blob/a4...kumod#L495 | 21:33 | |
afaict that line is the only code path for `fez upload` that has a prompt | 21:35 | ||
21:52
jpn left
22:10
dogbert17 left,
charsbar left,
charsbar joined
22:23
jpn joined
22:27
jgaz left,
jgaz joined
22:28
jpn left
22:48
patrickb left
22:49
patrickb joined
22:57
jpn joined
23:02
jpn left
23:11
jpn joined
23:16
jpn left
23:29
jpn joined
23:34
jpn left
23:37
kjp left
23:39
kjp joined
23:46
Voldenet left
23:47
Voldenet joined
|