š¦ Welcome to the MAIN() IRC channel of the Raku Programming Language (raku.org). Log available at irclogs.raku.org/raku/live.html . If you're a beginner, you can also check out the #raku-beginner channel! Set by lizmat on 6 September 2022. |
|||
wayland | .tell SmokeMachine: Haha, I've been working on ideas for a Prolog/Raku crossover of a very similar sort. My direction was to have something like a proto with multis. You may also enjoy www.cwi.nl/~apt/alma.ps if you're heading in this direction. This was third on my list, after Table-Oriented Programming and Tree-Oriented Programming. | 00:25 | |
tellable6 | wayland, I'll pass your message to SmokeMachine | ||
wayland | (for the record, the article I linked is about integrating Declarative structures into Imperative languages; in particular, Prolog-like structures into a Pascal-like language). | 00:26 | |
Is there a testing function/module that tests against $_ ? | 00:38 | ||
coleman | fancy PostScript <3 | 00:50 | |
wayland | The article was written in the 90s, but still useful. | 00:57 | |
.tell SmokeMachine You may also be interested in wayland.github.io/table-oriented-p...ueries.xml which is where I was starting to put together some ideas in this direction, and wayland.github.io/table-oriented-p...l-Flow.xml which is a raku-specific take on the Alma article I linked. | 01:00 | ||
tellable6 | wayland, I'll pass your message to SmokeMachine | ||
tbrowder | hi, is there any use space way to **validate** a rakudoc v1 file? | 01:28 | |
*user | |||
[Coke] | pretty sure there's a raku/doc test file doing that | 01:33 | |
tbrowder | you mean in roast? | 01:34 | |
[Coke] | github.com/Raku/doc/blob/main/t/02...d.rakutest - it's basically running 'raku -c --doc' on each file | ||
no, I mean github.com/Raku/doc | |||
tbrowder | hm...thnx | 01:35 | |
yeah, the raku -c option ..l | 01:45 | ||
i was using the --doc option, but i just tried the -c on my pod chunk and both opts pass my test chunk ok. i cannot believe my test pod is passing! | 01:53 | ||
seems very loose...unbalanced <>, spaces every where... | 01:55 | ||
oh, well, moving on...thnx [Coke] | 01:57 | ||
02:01
hulk joined
02:03
kylese left
02:15
hulk left,
kylese joined
03:19
jjido left
03:45
kylese left
03:46
kylese joined
04:02
Xliff joined
|
|||
Xliff | \o | 04:02 | |
What's the best way to add symbols to a Stash? | |||
wayland looks up stash... | 04:58 | ||
m: class Boring { our sub package_sub {} }; my $s = Boring.WHO; $s{"another_package"} = sub {}; say $s.raku | 05:03 | ||
camelia | ${"\&package_sub" => sub package_sub { #`(Sub|2329696143728) ... }, :another_package(sub { #`(Sub|2329696143864) ... })} | ||
wayland | Xliff: Does that help? | ||
Xliff | m: class Boring { our sub package_sub {} }; my $s = Boring.WHO; $s{"&another_package"} = sub { "Boo!" }; another_package | 05:05 | |
camelia | ===SORRY!=== Error while compiling <tmp> Undeclared routine: another_package used at line 1 |
||
Xliff | wayland: Thanks! I actually got this far already. That bit should tell you where I am, now. | ||
wayland: But yes, it helps. Want moar! :) | |||
wayland | Xliff: gist.github.com/wayland/f199612b1e...b52e134222 | 05:09 | |
You had a number of problems: 1. The compile-time checks were blocking the code from running; the EVAL prevents that, but you could also probably put most of the code in a BEGIN block, and leave the last line outside (and get rid of the EVAL) | 05:11 | ||
2. The sub needed to have the same name as the key. | |||
(The number of problems you had was 2 :p ) | |||
Xliff | m: class Boring { our sub package_sub {} }; my $s = Boring.WHO; $s{"&another_package"} = sub another_package { "Boo!" }; another_package | 05:18 | |
camelia | ( no output ) | ||
Xliff | m: class Boring { our sub package_sub {} }; my $s = Boring.WHO; $s{"&another_package"} = sub another_package { say "Boo!" }; another_package | ||
camelia | Boo! | ||
Xliff | \o/ | ||
wayland | Oh, nice! The EVAL was unnecessary then :) . | 05:22 | |
Still, it gave me the power to debug it, so it wasn't wasted. | |||
Unrelated: I'm getting the following error, and haven't managed to isolate it, but if anyone has any debugging tips, that'd be nice: Cannot find method 'set-statement-id' on object of type NQPMu | 05:23 | ||
(I'm trying to dynamically load a library, and it's always worked until now) | 05:24 | ||
m: my $skip = "a,b,c"; split(/\,/, $skip) ==> map({ $_ => 1 }) ==> my %skips; say %skips.raku | 05:27 | ||
camelia | {:a(1), :b(1), :c(1)} | ||
05:27
Aedil joined
|
|||
wayland | OK, that works; on the one on my home machine, it also outputs the error "Useless use of ==> in sink context" -- is that a bug? | 05:28 | |
Also, does anyone have any tips on how to get the "RUN zef install" step in my dockerfile to cache for longer and not re-run every time? | 05:32 | ||
Xliff | Could you show the code for the NQPMu error? | 05:43 | |
wayland: When you get a chance, .tell me with a link to the error. I'm about to pass out. Ja-ne! | 06:02 | ||
06:02
Xliff left
|
|||
wayland | Xliff: I haven't managed to isolate it (it's in a 7000 line codebase). I'm running it in a docker container now, and getting more sensible errors. | 06:40 | |
tellable6 | wayland, I'll pass your message to Xliff | ||
wayland | Sleep well :) | 06:41 | |
08:12
wayland76 joined
08:13
wayland left
08:20
Sgeo left
08:22
Sgeo joined
|
|||
nine | coranila: I have found out *why* accessing that sub works on MoarVM when compiling the setting but doesn't in my reduced example: it's because when compiling the setting we're in precompilation mode. github.com/Raku/nqp/blob/main/src/...d.nqp#L281 | 08:29 | |
09:56
jjido joined
11:36
Sgeo left
11:37
stanrifkin joined
11:49
jjido left
|
|||
coranila | nine: but that logic should be shared across the backends unless we're missing something on the JVM, right? | 11:58 | |
nine | Yes, there's definitely some other factor still missing. | 12:02 | |
coranila | any idea what i should try to look for? so far i've been trying to traverse up the stack trace to try and figure out what's going on, but i'm a bit out of practice with introspecting rakudo-j gut on that level, and havent really gotten a good grasp on what's happening yet | 12:08 | |
guts | |||
nine | Not really anything specific. I'd like to point out though that Rakudo's Perl6::Actions and World are clearly related to NQP's. The latter is a greatly simplified version and thus a lot easier to understand. | 12:19 | |
In this case this relationship also gives us the opportunity to compare Rakudo's working with NQP's broken version | |||
coranila | ah, true; that does seem to imply that nqp-j could be fine as-is, despite the fact that we're throwing from NQP's IndyBootstrap | 12:21 | |
as in, some aspect of the HLL instantiation for Perl6 or Raku doesnt have parity between moarvm and jvm - which is new i suppose, but nice to have confirmd | |||
or at least reaffirmed... | |||
12:28
clarkema2 left
12:29
clarkema2 joined
13:18
apac joined
13:22
apac left
14:07
stanrifkin left
14:18
stanrifkin joined
|
|||
jubilatious1_98524 | needs split( / \, /, ... backslashed comma on my machine. | 14:20 | |
14:29
apac joined
|
|||
tbrowder | hi, for App::Mi6 users, note it does not yet recognize =begin/=end rakudoc. i just filed issue #183 there. it would help if other users would add support for the issue at github.com/skaji/mi6/issues | 14:32 | |
14:41
clarkema2 left
14:43
clarkema joined
|
|||
tbrowder | well, skaji said it only uses āraku ādoc module.rakumodā so it should work. iāll do some more checking. maybe iām wrong about current raku recognizing rakudoc š | 14:57 | |
ok, closing the issue | 15:53 | ||
16:04
apac left
16:26
lichtkind joined
17:00
apac joined
17:56
sdomi left
18:54
Sgeo joined
18:58
leah2 left
19:11
leah2 joined
19:13
jjido joined
20:05
librasteve_ joined
20:10
Aedil left
|
|||
coleman | rebooting the server that hosts cro.services | 21:23 | |
tbrowder | m: raku -v | 21:36 | |
camelia | ===SORRY!=== Error while compiling <tmp> Undeclared routines: raku used at line 1 v used at line 1 |
||
21:41
lichtkind left
22:48
dustinm`_ left
22:52
apac left
22:56
dustinm`_ joined
23:52
jjido left
|
|||
leont | Observing some weird result with Promise.anyof here: github.com/Raku/tap-harness6/blob/...umod#L1030 | 23:53 | |
Basically, if I put those arguments in an array, and then call anyof with that array, it will die there, but if I use the arguments directly (like it currently does in the code) it lives. | 23:54 | ||
Am I missing something? |