07:04 Pe_Elle left 07:14 Pe_Elle joined 07:15 Pe_Elle left, Pe_Elle joined 10:04 Pe_Elle left 10:09 Pe_Elle joined 10:14 Pe_Elle left 10:18 sena_kun joined 10:28 Pe_Elle joined 11:29 Pe_Elle left 11:50 timo1 is now known as timo 11:57 Pe_Elle joined 12:01 Pe_Elle left 12:16 Pe_Elle joined 13:18 Pe_Elle left, Pe_Elle joined 14:21 Pe_Elle left 14:41 Pe_Elle joined 15:26 librasteve_ joined
librasteve .seen SmokeMachine 15:26
SmokeMachine: just wanted to give you a heads' up that I did include some cromponent code in my demo (tomorrow's advent post) - the code I made just finished today (and it was done in a hurry as the original date was 21st) here github.com/librasteve/raku-Cro-Web.../02-sharc1 (not main branch). This is about halfway to an MVP - I need to put in Red (ie data model inside the component), merge in 15:35
your latest Cromponent updates and fix some things I broke and distinguish between installable libraries and site specific libraries... but I thnk that the sample site is pretty much in the form of my idea of how to build a website (which may be very different to your idea ?!)
15:35 kawaii joined
It would suit me to have Cromponent be an external module dependency - better than duplicating the code - but I see that you have not been able to be as active on the Cromponent prototype recently so I am happy to keep that code within these site level examples for now, but with the idea that I would maybe release and support as a raku module. Please can you give me an idea of your thoughts for this? When Cromponent 15:41
does become a module in its own right, then I would probably break out the library of crompoments to also be external dependencies - maybe one for HTMX examples and one for Pico CSS examples.
15:43 Pe_Elle left 15:44 Pe_Elle joined
PS. maybe a module name like HTML::Components or Cro::WebApp::Components would be better than Cromponents?[yeah I like that Cromponents is funny ... but the rest of the Cro naming is quite straight-laced ...] 15:45
16:46 Pe_Elle left 16:47 Pe_Elle joined 16:51 Pe_Elle left 17:05 Pe_Elle joined 17:45 kawaii left 18:08 Pe_Elle left 18:22 Pe_Elle joined
lizmat colloquially cromponents could continue to be used :-) 18:52
scullucs "Cromponents" sounds perfectly cromulent. 18:56
19:24 Pe_Elle left 19:39 Pe_Elle joined
SmokeMachine librasteve_: Hi! So would it help you if I released what we have now? 19:39
I wouldn't say `the rest of the Cro naming is quite straight-laced`, once its name came from `my Cro $service` (at least that's what I remember). I'm not a big fan of straight-laced names... 19:42
it have no tests yet, but if it will help you, I can release it now... 19:43
ans sorry for not being very active the last days... I'm working too much... 19:44
librasteve_: can you see if this helps you? github.com/FCO/Cromponent/pull/6 20:28
20:40 Pe_Elle left 20:55 Pe_Elle joined 21:00 Pe_Elle left 21:28 Pe_Elle joined 21:33 Pe_Elle left 22:00 Pe_Elle joined 22:05 Pe_Elle left
librasteve your module - your name :-) 22:09
please do release what you wrote as early experimental - that would be very helpful 22:10
i can try and write some tests and PR if you like 22:11
22:33 Pe_Elle joined
oh - we do need to work out the “reentrency” issue i posted please 22:47
SmokeMachine have you tried that with this new version? 22:48
I don't see why that would break and I could't reproduce.. 22:49
22:54 sena_kun left
SmokeMachine it's released... let's see if it will go to raku.land... 22:55
librasteve_: you need your version of cro webapp to make that work... 23:00
librasteve I tried with the old version… will merge and close issue if fixed 23:07
&afk 23:08
SmokeMachine If that’s not fixed, if you could share a code to reproduce the error, I can try to fix
23:37 Pe_Elle left 23:52 Pe_Elle joined