|
00:19
japhb left
00:25
japhb joined
03:22
arunvickram joined
03:26
arunvickram left,
arunvickram joined
03:29
arunvickram left
03:30
arunvickram joined
03:57
arunvickram left
03:58
arunvickram joined
04:20
arunvickram left
04:42
arunvickram joined
04:54
arunvickram left
10:06
librasteve_ left
10:30
librasteve_ joined
12:50
arunvickram joined,
arunvickram left
12:51
arunvickram joined
14:23
arunvickram left
14:52
arunvickram joined
15:00
arunvickram left
18:26
librasteve_ left
18:55
librasteve_ joined
|
|||
| aruniecrisps | @SmokeMachine do you have any thoughts on what the first step should be? | 20:09 | |
| SmokeMachine | I think I'd say name routes | 20:10 | |
| aruniecrisps | Right, what would be the best way of approaching named routes in your opinion? | 20:23 | |
| SmokeMachine | i just remembered this exists: github.com/croservices/cro-http/pull/208 | 20:52 | |
| but originally, before I knew that PR existed, my plan was to do something this: github.com/croservices/cro-http/pull/207 | 20:54 | ||
| this test file shows what I had in mind: github.com/croservices/cro-http/pu...f2c1a9c902 | 20:56 | ||
|
23:06
librasteve_ left
|
|||