|
github.com/moarvm/moarvm | IRC logs at irclog.perlgeek.de/moarvm/today Set by moderator on 3 May 2018. |
|||
|
01:58
ilbot3 joined
|
|||
| moderator | github.com/moarvm/moarvm | IRC logs at irclog.perlgeek.de/moarvm/today | ||
|
05:18
unicodable6 joined,
statisfiable6 joined,
greppable6 joined,
nativecallable6 joined,
quotable6 joined,
committable6 joined,
undersightable6 joined
05:58
domidumont joined
06:22
domidumont joined
06:37
AlexDaniel joined
07:15
robertle joined
|
|||
| AlexDaniel | squashable6: next | 07:27 | |
| squashable6 | AlexDaniel, ⚠🍕 Next SQUASHathon in ≈2 hours (2018-05-05 UTC-12⌁UTC+14). See github.com/rakudo/rakudo/wiki/Mont...Squash-Day | ||
|
07:57
domidumont joined
08:11
domidumont joined
09:22
brrt joined
|
|||
| brrt | . | 09:25 | |
| good * | |||
| lizmat | brrt o/ | 09:28 | |
| brrt | ohai | 09:32 | |
| did you get a chance to test jit-moar-ops | |||
| lizmat | no :-( | ||
| breakfast& | |||
| brrt | no problem | 09:34 | |
| lizmat: I saw also, in the whole thread, this: news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7807083 | 09:39 | ||
|
09:40
Ulti joined
|
|||
| brrt | and it was funny because building a jit was apparently magical thinking | 09:49 | |
| samcv | lol at the "python 3 is killing python" though | 09:59 | |
|
09:59
robertle joined
|
|||
| Ulti has been programming in Python 3.6 for the last year | 10:00 | ||
| brrt | i recently found out i don't know python as well as i thought | 10:02 | |
| Ulti | any moans about the 2.x 3.x thing are from a position of ignorance I tried 3.x about 5 years ago and it was a very different story to now | ||
| its totally fine now | |||
| brrt what surprised you? | 10:03 | ||
| brrt | well, print being a statement in python2 | 10:04 | |
| that one keeps on giving | |||
|
11:26
brrt joined
11:57
AlexDaniel joined
|
|||
| robertle | "MoarVM panic: Internal error: invalid thread ID 1270578208 in GC work pass" is this a known problem? | 12:59 | |
| lizmat | I've seen it in the past, but not recently | 13:03 | |
| robertle | is there anything I can do to shine some light on it? | 13:08 | |
| lizmat | gist the code that produces the error and the versions you are using | 13:09 | |
| jnthn | Unfortunately, it's meaning i "there's memory corruption" | ||
| *is | |||
| robertle | I am having trouble getting it into a less intermittent or smaller state, when I change it too much the problem disappears. but the version is This is Rakudo version 2018.04.1 built on MoarVM version 2018.04.1, and the code is github.com/robertlemmen/perl6-cache-async at g1f4dafd | 13:13 | |
| i get it by running ./bench.pl6, about every otehr time | 13:14 | ||
| also managed to get a segfault! | 13:16 | ||
| jnthn | Yeah, the error you got basically means "we know we're going to segfault if we continue" :) | 13:17 | |
| robertle | as well as a "Cannot look up attributes in a Perl6::Metamodel::ClassHOW type object", but that could well be a logic error in my code. although it's weird that the entries in the stack trace are all method definitions, not actual code lines that do something. of course there is some code related to the method entry, but usually I get these from stuff I wrote... | 13:18 | |
| brrt | it certainly seems like memory corroption of some kind | 13:21 | |
|
13:44
AlexDaniel joined
13:48
zakharyas joined
13:59
brrt joined
|
|||
| nine | Ulti: there is still to this day no way to get our ~ 1.5 million lines of Python 2 code to run on Python 3. I'd love to be proven ignorant on that. | 14:01 | |
| Ulti | no way, or no way without effort | 14:11 | |
| I meant more that python 3 itself is entirely viable on its own now | |||
| I dont really understand the fad idea of why you would upgrade if you have a perfect servicable python 2 code base | |||
| nine | Well since there's no way we could affort to port it manually, I'd say no way. | ||
| Because support for Python 2 will run out? | 14:12 | ||
| Ulti | and what form does that support take that has an impact on your company? | ||
| nine | In the long term it will become more and more difficult to even install it | ||
| Ulti | by that time how relevant will your 1.5 million lines of code be, I mean banks sort of made this mistake with cobol I guess | 14:13 | |
| nine | It was 1.5 million years ago when I counted. It's probably a lot more now and growing. | 14:14 | |
| Ulti | nine: is new stuff written in the 2/3 style? | ||
| like it is possible to move gradually, I have no idea if its worth it to anyone | 14:15 | ||
| nine | The thing is, it's not one large code base. It's Python expressions embedded in HTML templates (Zope's DTML) of 1500 customer websites. | 14:18 | |
| brrt | nine: i thought there was a python 2to3 converter? | 14:21 | |
| Ulti | the one thing I will say is I dont think python 3 offers enough for the fuss its causing | 14:23 | |
| which is kind of interesting Perl 6 its too different for people to want to "upgrade" and Python 3 is too similar, makes you wonder if a sweet spot exists at all | 14:24 | ||
| brrt | oh, that's easy. it is 'management mandates we do $x' | 14:33 | |
| geekosaur | that's just the workaround. underlying both is "I don''t like change" | 14:50 | |
| and finding any excuse to avoid it | |||
|
16:34
brrt joined
16:38
Ven`` joined
16:46
domidumont joined
|
|||
| samcv | so, implementing index_by_codepoint is going to be more annoying than i thought. i'm still not sure how i want to do it | 16:58 | |
| what i'd like is that we have a dual based indexing. where it'd return the grapheme number and the codepoint number. so like if it's the 30th grapheme and the 2nd codepoint in that grapheme, it'd return an array [29,1] | 16:59 | ||
|
17:14
domidumont joined
|
|||
| jnthn | samcv: I don't think we should implement codepoint operations on grapheme strings, but rather have codepoint strings | 18:20 | |
| samcv: Probably what lies behind Uni should not be a VMArray (which was expedient at the time), but some kind of codepoint-level "string" | 18:21 | ||
| There's just a ton of design questions around it all | |||
| And what operations should be Str-coercing and what operations should be polymorphic | |||
| I don't think Str as a type should be mixing the levels, though. | 18:22 | ||
| timotimo | will Uni be the type for that? | 18:26 | |
| dogbert17 | here's a gist of the SEGV reported by robertle earlier today, gist.github.com/dogbert17/f3cd8dd9...b40dffd460 | 18:28 | |
| jnthn | Yes | ||
| jnthn wonders if he should try and write up what thoughts he has on Uni, as well as what design problems will need solving | 18:29 | ||
| samcv | jnthn: yeah. i was thinking about that. which is why i started writing some code and then decided it was too early and i should think it out further :) | 18:50 | |
| but. we should be able to do codepoint operations on a NFG string as well. but i agree we need operations that are by codepoint | |||
| since atm we just have NFG and NFC type things (plus utf8-c8) | |||
| jnthn | Well, the overall design is that Str is grapheme level, Uni is codepoint level, and Buf is byte level | 18:54 | |
| Well, also Str/Uni/Blob are immutable | |||
| Buf being a mutable Blob | |||
| Though none of these are Iterable | 18:55 | ||
| They're all items | |||
| But yeah, I figure that if one does something like Str.split(Uni) then that'd be a codepoint split on a Str | 18:56 | ||
| But I don't fancy a combinatoric explosion of these | |||
| Also an open question what Uni.substr(...) means | |||
| Under the principle that operations have consistent semantics across types | 18:57 | ||
| [Coke] | /win 2 | ||
| buggable | [Coke], Thank you for entering Accidental /win Lottery! The next draw will happen in 3 weeks, 6 days, 5 hours, 2 minutes, and 17 seconds | ||
| jnthn | So is it conceptually Uni.Str.substr(...) (though with a potentially more efficient implementation to avoid the throwaway coercion) | 18:58 | |
| That'd imply we want a subuni :) | |||
| Which'd go well with subbuf | |||
| My overall point here being I think we'll need to go through each of the operations one can do on a Str and decide what they mean, if anything, on a Uni | 18:59 | ||
| As well as defining stuff like Uni ~ Str, Str ~ Uni, etc. | |||
| Even before all of that, though, we'll need to deal with Uni I/O, and probably make a call on whether we're going to keep Uni as a VMArray or instead have it more like an MVMString | 19:00 | ||
| Which'll mean answering things like whether we want to have open("foo", :uni), open("foo", :nfc) etc. | 19:01 | ||
| And if so, does .get and .lines give you Uni and an iterator of Uni | 19:02 | ||
| So yeah, it's...big. :) | |||
| And this is before we even talk about the grammar engine. :) | |||
|
19:20
FROGGS joined
19:22
brrt joined
19:31
robertle joined
20:20
Kaiepi joined
|
|||
| Geth | MoarVM/jit-moar-ops: 9 commits pushed by (Bart Wiegmans)++ | 20:40 | |
|
20:52
Kaypie joined
21:22
MasterDuke joined
22:21
Ven`` joined
|
|||
| timotimo | what the heck, appveyor wants me to choose which account to log in with; "timo" or "samcv" | 23:21 | |