|
00:31
lizmat_ joined
00:33
lizmat left
01:55
librasteve_ left
09:15
lizmat joined
|
|||
| lizmat | m: module Foo { say $?MODULE.^name } # habere-et-disper also see $?CLASS for classes and $?PACKAGE for packages | 09:19 | |
| camelia | Foo | ||
| timemelon | I guess if the pointy end points to the shorter list to be looped over, then »×« makes sense for a version that pads with Nil rather than looping, since neither pointy end points to an arg | 09:31 | |
| I phrased that a bit badly, pointy end points to the list to be cycled | 09:32 | ||
|
10:55
lizmat left,
lizmat_ left,
lizmat joined
|
|||
| jubilatious1_98524 | It's a common problem in Data Science, you have two datasets and need to throw them in a 2D data structure (i.e. csv table). But one is longer than another and you can't zero-fill (because zero has measurement meaning). | 12:57 | |
| I'd say the opposite. If »×« is intersection and «×» is union, then the »×« looks "narrow" while the «×» looks "wide". The wide one should pad. But I probably got that backwards!!!! | 13:05 | ||
|
15:36
Eric22 joined
15:38
Eric22 left
16:53
dakkar left
20:03
librasteve_ joined
|
|||
| librasteve | I vote with »×« looks "narrow" while the «×» looks "wide". | 20:12 | |
|
22:42
librasteve_ left
23:00
sjn left
23:01
sjn joined
|
|||