|
🦋 Welcome to the IRC channel of the core developers of the Raku Programming Language (raku.org #rakulang). This channel is logged for the purpose of history keeping about its development | evalbot usage: 'm: say 3;' or /msg camelia m: ... | Logs available at irclogs.raku.org/raku-dev/live.html | For MoarVM see #moarvm Set by lizmat on 8 June 2022. |
|||
|
05:37
lizmat_ joined
05:41
lizmat left
09:46
Geth joined
10:39
sjm_ left
16:35
rakkable left
16:36
rakkable joined
|
|||
| nine | Is there any progress on make install with RakuAST? | 19:02 | |
| [Coke] | Haven't seen any; nine, should bootstrap-rakuast build? (just tried a checkout, it was happy with the existing nqp/moar, but then died with An exception X::Comp::AdHoc occurred while evaluating a BEGIN: | 19:51 | |
| (before install) | |||
| (during build) | 19:53 | ||
| nuking nqp/moar, trying again | 19:54 | ||
| timo | how long do i run nqp tests in serial to figure out if maybe the segfault happens only if nqps are run in parallel ... | 20:06 | |
| nine | [Coke]: I see a similar failure here | 20:13 | |
| [Coke] | timo: it's using prove, right? TEST_JOBS=1 | 20:16 | |
| nine | [Coke]: oh, sorry, false alarm. Build went fine. You are running it with RAKUDO_RAKUAST=1 make, right? | 20:17 | |
| timo | i'm using -j1 | 20:19 | |
| [Coke] | nine: ah, no, I wrongly assumed it was defaulted on in the branch. my bad. | 20:21 | |
| timo: that should do it (if you're running prove and not 'make test') | 20:22 | ||
| timo | yeah, that's what i'm doing | 20:43 | |
| the question was something else though | |||
| hm, i don't actually have like a counter running though | 20:59 | ||
|
21:43
finanalyst left
|
|||
| timo | hum. but it also crashed compiling a part of Rakudo during its build. and that's not very multithreaded right? so maybe parallelism can't be the cause, only make it more likely to show for some reason? | 22:01 | |
| but also that was on mipsel rather than armel i think | 22:02 | ||
| i'll let it go over night just to be sure … | 23:00 | ||