16 Jun 2026
Geth ¦ rakudo/main: f38ab67b32 | (Nick Logan)++ (committed using GitHub Web editor) | 2 files 00:09
¦ rakudo/main: Merge pull request #6274 from ugexe/ugexe/test-assign-metaop-mu
¦ rakudo/main:
¦ rakudo/main: RakuAST: Accept a Mu lhs and rhs in the test-assign metaops
¦ rakudo/main: review: github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/f38ab67b32
¦ rakudo/main: 14eaee6ddb | (Nick Logan)++ | 3 files 00:13
¦ rakudo/main: RakuAST: don't redeclare a special variable bound in a sub-signature
¦ rakudo/main:
¦ rakudo/main: A block or routine declares an implicit $_, $/, and $! unless its signature
¦ rakudo/main: already binds one. The check for an existing binding only looked at top-level
¦ rakudo/main: parameters, so a special variable bound inside a destructuring sub-signature,
¦ rakudo/main: such as the $_ in `-> (:value($_))`, went unnoticed. The implicit one was then
¦ rakudo/main: declared alongside it, and the two declarations of the same lexical failed to
¦ rakudo/main: <…commit message has 6 more lines…>
¦ rakudo/main: review: github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/14eaee6ddb
¦ rakudo/main: aa5e2499d0 | (Nick Logan)++ (committed using GitHub Web editor) | 3 files
¦ rakudo/main: Merge pull request #6277 from ugexe/ugexe/rakuast-subsignature-special-vars
¦ rakudo/main:
¦ rakudo/main: RakuAST: don't redeclare a special variable bound in a sub signature
¦ rakudo/main: review: github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/aa5e2499d0
ugexe i wonder how far along in the ecosystem we actually are 00:50
[Coke] ===> Testing: ASTQuery:ver<0.0.7>:auth<zef:FCO> - that worked! 02:14
ugexe: are we at a point where I could try a RAKUAST run (with a normal build of raku) and get you some useful output? 02:15
I think I'd have to do a modified run with maybe legacy 2026.05 and AST HEAD? 02:16
ugexe couldnt hurt to try, although i see Blin has JSON::Fast as a dependency which still needs to be fixed to work on rakuast 02:45