|
00:02
ACfromTX joined,
ACfromTX is now known as atcroft
01:01
guifa joined
01:28
atcroft left
02:24
hulk joined
02:25
kylese left
02:32
guifa left
03:15
hulk left,
kylese joined
03:28
ACfromTX joined,
ACfromTX is now known as atcroft
04:44
lichtkind_ joined
04:46
lichtkind left
05:46
JimmyZhuo joined
05:53
JimmyZhuo left
06:51
Aedil joined
07:01
atcroft left
08:00
ACfromTX joined
08:17
jetchisel left
08:21
jetchisel joined
09:31
Sgeo left
09:53
abraxxa joined
09:59
wayland76 joined,
wayland left
10:04
abraxxa left
13:31
simcop2387 left
13:42
simcop2387 joined
14:04
lichtkind joined,
lichtkind_ left
14:15
guifa joined
15:01
lichtkind left
15:53
guifa left
|
|||
| disbot8 | <antononcube> Please vote: news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46478300 | 16:13 | |
|
16:19
Sgeo joined
|
|||
| disbot8 | <librasteve> done | 16:26 | |
| <melezhik.> Done | 16:36 | ||
| <melezhik.> If some is interested in brand new project related to infrastructure monitoring and testing , please let me know , there is a channel in discord . The client part is going to be written on golang and server side is on Raku . | 16:37 | ||
| <antononcube> Are you going to "double tap" it? | 16:39 | ||
| <antononcube> Great name, BTW! | |||
|
18:22
arkiuat joined
|
|||
| arkiuat | aruniecrisps, wouldn't that be somewhere in one of the docs.raku.org/language/functions#Re-dispatching next tools? | 18:23 | |
| SmokeMachine | I just want to say that I don’t like the idea of charging a fee to something that will be developed by the community | ||
| tellable6 | 2026-01-01T21:33:21Z #raku <wayland> arkiuat In that case, ignore what I said about AIs, but, you're welcome :). | ||
| disbot8 | <melezhik.> Thanks Anton! | 18:25 | |
| SmokeMachine | And that I still think that focusing esforce s into a single project not even started yet (so no idea if it will get any traction) have a higher chance to fail than having many projects being created organically… | 18:27 | |
| disbot8 | <melezhik.> SmokeMachine - I am sorry - not sure if I get it rights, your last two comments relate to the mine ? ) | 18:30 | |
| SmokeMachine | melezhik.: no, sorry, I just wrote that after reading problem-solving comments… sorry for the confusion | 18:32 | |
| disbot8 | <melezhik.> Ahh 😌 ok , then just coincidence, no worries | 18:35 | |
|
19:10
Geth joined
19:13
arkiuat left
19:20
arkiuat joined
|
|||
| timo | aruniecrisps, you're hoping to do call/cc in raku? | 19:23 | |
|
19:24
arkiuat left
19:41
arkiuat joined
19:46
arkiuat left
19:58
arkiuat joined
20:06
arkiuat left
|
|||
| disbot8 | <aruniecrisps> @timo yea kinda haha i had an idea for continuations-based web apps in raku 🙂 | 20:16 | |
| <aruniecrisps> @arkiuat no i was thinking more like callcc in ruby and call/cc in scheme/racket | |||
| timo | i'm not sure how exactly to work with the continuation ops, but we have nqp::continuationcontrol, nqp::continuationreset and nqp::continuationinvoke and our continuations are one-shot | 20:20 | |
| maybe that's already all you need to know in order to get what you want? | |||
| i don't know how continuation tags work and what it means for a tag to be "protected" | 20:21 | ||
| oh, could it be that the code you pass to continuationcontrol is invoked with the continuation as its argument? that would make it very much like call/cc, though i'm not sure if a "reset point" is normally involved in scheme and friends | 20:24 | ||
|
20:26
arkiuat joined
20:31
arkiuat left
20:44
arkiuat joined
|
|||
| disbot8 | <librasteve> SmokeMachine: are you talking about the SOS idea? if so, please share your concerns in that issue. fwiw any and all code developed by the community should be free under the Artistic 2.0 | 20:53 | |
| SmokeMachine | I mean this: usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/...475071.JPG | 21:17 | |
|
21:21
abraxxa joined
|
|||
| disbot8 | <librasteve> lol - that is anyway a fantasy | 21:25 | |
| <librasteve> i’m happy to agree that any proceeds from foundation income should be used solely for community related expenses (such as fosdem merch, grants and so on) … as is already the case | 21:27 | ||
| <librasteve> but note that this kind of thing is not under my control, but rather the Raku Steering Council and TPRF governance | 21:30 | ||
| SmokeMachine | That’s why I haven’t commented anything on that repo yet… I’m waiting to know if I want to be part of that or not | 21:33 | |
| disbot8 | <aruniecrisps> @timo I may have asked this earlier but I'm wondering if it's not worth it to document nqp ops, even though it's not supposed to be meant for end-users at all. I'd be willing work on that initiative if time permits | 21:54 | |
| timo | presumably you've seen this? github.com/Raku/nqp/blob/main/docs/ops.markdown and it's not enough? | 21:55 | |
| ah, it has none of the continuation ops, because of course not :) | 21:56 | ||
| [Coke] | I felt like we did all the ones that docs-only folks could do, most of what's left needs a core dev to comment on. | 22:29 | |
|
22:32
abraxxa left
|
|||
| timo | oh no it's my fault :) | 22:34 | |
| [Coke] | I got to a point where the last N I looked at were all "WTF is this" | 22:38 | |
| timo | that's probably fair | ||
| disbot8 | <aruniecrisps> @timo I was thinking we add this to the Raku documentation website if possible | 22:46 | |
| <aruniecrisps> The nqp ops documentation | 22:47 | ||
| timo | that doesn't really fit very well, nqp isn't part of the raku language, only of the rakudo implementation | 23:07 | |
| as you said, they are not meant to be used by end users | |||
| there are no stability guarantees at all | |||
| disbot8 | <aruniecrisps> understandable | 23:09 | |
| <aruniecrisps> perhaps in that case what we could maybe do is we could add some reference to the continuation ops in the md file you sent | 23:10 | ||
| <aruniecrisps> i'll play around with it and see | 23:11 | ||
| <aruniecrisps> i stumbled upon this gem | 23:13 | ||
| <aruniecrisps> edumentab.github.io/rakudo-and-nqp...s-day2.pdf | |||
|
23:22
guifa joined
|
|||
