| apogee_ntv | antononcube: Same. | 00:01 | |
| SmokeMachine | I'm still not very comfortable with that... :( | 00:11 | |
| apogee_ntv | I am but only because I write very long specs and then review the code against the spec after. | 00:20 | |
| I start with a spec, break it down into tickets each with a plan with the LLM, then assign tickets and review them against the plans, then review unstaged vs the spec and make sure the tests cover it. | 00:21 | ||
| Each plan has a definition of done, the spec has a definition of done. | |||
| Original spec is all written by me but can be revised through the exploration (often I find what I write is not ambiguous to me but is ambiguous to the LLM). | 00:24 | ||
| Its not the fastest way to develop with AI but I think it's a way that balances speed of delivery with understanding of what's getting built. | 00:25 | ||
|
01:05
MasterDuke joined
01:52
hulk joined
01:53
kylese left
|
|||
| disbot | <anagogogo> it's a reasonable way to do things tbh | 01:54 | |
| <anagogogo> you wouldnt expect much of the AI output to be if you had virtually no more input | 01:55 | ||
|
01:57
MasterDuke left
02:15
hulk left,
kylese joined
02:46
vasko4535586165 joined
02:48
vasko453558616 left,
vasko4535586165 is now known as vasko453558616
03:43
vasko4535586169 joined
03:46
vasko453558616 left
03:48
vasko45355861691 joined
03:49
vasko4535586169 left,
vasko45355861691 is now known as vasko4535586169
03:52
vasko45355861691 joined
03:54
vasko4535586169 left,
vasko45355861691 is now known as vasko4535586169
|
|||