|
00:14
ds7832 left
00:22
Manifest0 left
00:52
arkiuat left
01:04
arkiuat joined
01:14
Pixi left
01:15
Pixi joined
01:20
hulk joined
01:21
kylese left
|
|||
| disbot10 | <simon_sibl> not sure I know how to reproduce this: github.com/4zv4l/dfs/blob/main/Node.rakumod basically when I start one Node then add the other, it works, when I add data on the first node, they can sync right, but if I add data on the second node, it crashes, it seems when the first node request data to the second one, the second one doesnt receive the request, and I am not sure why.. | 01:50 | |
|
02:15
hulk left,
kylese joined
03:03
stanrifkin_ joined
03:06
stanrifkin left
|
|||
| disbot10 | <simon_sibl> okay it works, I changed to Async and somehow, that works now xD | 03:47 | |
| <simon_sibl> feels great when the code works ! | |||
|
04:51
stanrifkin_ left
05:27
guifa left
|
|||
| disbot10 | <simon_sibl> there is a weird infinite loop sometimes the way the watch and stat time of the file is handled | 05:38 | |
|
05:54
Aedil joined
|
|||
| ab5tract | I would use promises with manual vow keeping | 05:54 | |
| Also, there's a race condition in your skip-file check as its currently written | 05:55 | ||
| disbot10 | <simon_sibl> aaah must be that | 06:16 | |
| <simon_sibl> would you be able to enlight me more about the vow keeping you are talking about and that race condition ? | |||
|
06:25
Sgeo left
06:43
lichtkind_ joined
06:45
vrurg joined
06:46
vrurg_ left
06:52
vrurg_ joined,
vrurg left
06:53
vrurg joined
06:56
vrurg_ left
07:31
abraxxa joined
07:35
Geth joined
07:47
avuserow left
07:49
avuserow joined
08:06
Manifest0 joined
08:29
melezhik_ joined
|
|||
| melezhik_ | o/ | 08:29 | |
| I am looking for volunteers passioned about QA. I need people with spare Linux boxes and qemu enabled to test Rocky Linux distortion using Raku and Sparky. We are going to run test in HPC mode in Sparky cluster which is fun stuff to do, but I need VM resources. Please let me know if you are interested ... | 08:31 | ||
| distortion -> distributive | 08:34 | ||
|
08:37
arkiuat left
08:39
melezhik_ left
08:48
arkiuat joined
08:53
arkiuat left
08:54
melezhik_ joined,
melezhik_ left
09:22
arkiuat joined
09:27
arkiuat left
09:38
apa_c joined
09:56
apa_c left
09:57
arkiuat joined
10:02
arkiuat left
10:09
apa_c joined
10:10
abraxxa left
10:12
abraxxa-home joined
10:18
abraxxa-home left
10:21
apa_c left
10:24
apa_c joined
10:29
arkiuat joined
10:32
abraxxa-home joined
10:34
arkiuat left
10:35
ds7832 joined
10:42
apac joined
10:43
apa_c left
10:51
melezhik joined
11:01
apac left,
arkiuat joined
11:06
arkiuat left
11:18
abraxxa-home left
11:31
arkiuat joined
11:36
arkiuat left
11:40
ds7832 left,
ds7832 joined
12:01
stanrifkin joined
12:03
arkiuat joined
12:08
arkiuat left
12:32
arkiuat joined
12:36
arkiuat left
12:47
apac joined
13:06
arkiuat joined
13:11
arkiuat left
13:20
Sgeo joined
13:23
Aedil left
13:27
Aedil joined
13:33
arkiuat joined
13:38
arkiuat left
13:48
librasteve_ joined
13:56
apac left,
apac joined
14:08
arkiuat joined
14:13
arkiuat left
14:17
arkiuat joined
14:22
arkiuat left
14:36
arkiuat joined
14:42
arkiuat left
14:45
xkr47 left,
xkr47 joined
15:01
ds7823 joined
15:10
arkiuat joined,
ds7832 left
15:11
apac left
15:15
arkiuat left
15:28
ds7832 joined
15:31
apac joined,
arkiuat joined
15:46
ds7832 left
15:47
ds7823 left
16:08
abraxxa-home joined
16:11
melezhik left
16:18
abraxxa-home left
16:19
abraxxa-home joined
16:53
human-blip left
16:55
human-blip joined
17:08
abraxxa-home left
17:13
itaipu left
17:27
apac left
17:29
itaipu joined
18:39
apac joined
18:50
apogee_ntv left
18:52
apogee_ntv joined
|
|||
| arkiuat | in docs.raku.org/type/Any#method_iterator it says: "Most subclasses redefine this method for optimization, so it's mostly types that do not actually iterate the ones that actually use this implementation." | 20:47 | |
| Does anyone have any idea what the part after the comma is trying to say? | 20:48 | ||
| I suspect there is a word or two dropped somewhere. | |||
| disbot10 | <jubilatious1_98524> @arkiuat "This is the default iterator implementation, however as many subclasses actually redefine this method (for optimization)--this method is only used for a minority of types." | 21:07 | |
|
21:23
apac left
|
|||
| arkiuat | Hmm, I'm not sure. | 21:46 | |
|
21:57
ds7832 joined
21:59
ds7832 left
22:04
ds7832 joined
22:06
ds7832 left
22:10
ds7832 joined
22:12
ds7832 left
22:13
lichtkind_ left
22:23
Aedil left
22:35
kylese left
|
|||
| Voldenet | What it's trying to say is that Any.iterator is useless | 22:37 | |
| because all it does is converting $thing into ($thing) and giving you iterator to that list | 22:39 | ||
| or rather, the only context where it makes sense in is where some sub only accepts iterator | 22:40 | ||
| but you want to give one-element iterable instead | 22:41 | ||
| in fact, it'd be more informative to simply link to the code :D `multi method iterator(Any:) { self.list.iterator }` | 22:44 | ||
|
22:53
ds7832 joined
23:32
ds7832 left
|
|||