| 5 Jul 2018 | |||
| travis-ci | MoarVM build errored. Samantha McVey 'Use the trusty not the precise llvm repos | 19:17 | |
| MoarVM build errored. Samantha McVey 'Try adding llvm and clang to packages list' | 21:16 | ||
| Geth | ¦ MoarVM: Use the llvm 5.0 toolchain deb line | 21:55 | |
| ¦ MoarVM: The non versioned url doesn't have llvm 5.0 | |||
| 31 Mar 2019 | |||
| MasterDuke | timotimo: have you seen www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=new...Time-Trace ? not directly useful to us i assume, but maybe some stuff to take inspiration from | 17:40 | |
| 14 Apr 2019 | |||
| Ulti | FOUND GNU TOOL /usr/local/opt/llvm/bin/clang | 12:29 | |
| 29 May 2019 | |||
| timotimo | i'm still convinced a llvm/clang instrumentation could be built that checks our gc invariants | 23:35 | |
| 7 Sep 2019 | |||
| brrt | llvm toolchain should be getting its own linker one of these days | 13:18 | |
| 5 Apr 2020 | |||
| timotimo | so i looked into what llvm has in terms of vectorization stuff | 13:31 | |
| 5 Jun 2020 | |||
| patrickb | samcv: I'm currently trying to replicate the travis CI config in azure CI. There is a LLVM coverage configuration that generates coverage reports on moarvm.github.io/coverage/ | 19:40 | |
| 5 Jan 2021 | |||
| brrt | llvm has not yet ever worked well for JITs | 14:26 | |
| nwc10 | I don't yet remember anyone writign a blog post to say "We used LLVM for our dynamic language JIT and it worked really well first time" | ||
| Both Pyston (the first version) and Safari both found that they needed to add another layer before LLVM, didn't they? | |||
| jnthn | They had to tier it because the llvm approach was good for high quality code | 14:27 | |
| 11 Jan 2021 | |||
| MasterDuke | openbenchmarking.org/result/200706...&sgm=1 doesn't show much of a difference in compiling the kernel or llvm | 12:05 | |
| 24 Jan 2021 | |||
| nine | I've read here a couple of times (since people keep bringing it up) that LLVM JIT wouldn't be nearly as simple and/or wouldn't work as well as people assume. Looking at the docs I do get the impression that integrating LLVM is hardly straight forward. | 09:10 | |
| 25 Jan 2021 | |||
| jnthn | I didn't yet get chance to read the article about GCC as JIT, to see which of the LLVM as JIT concerns it manages to avoid | 08:13 | |
| 9 Apr 2021 | |||
| nwc10 | we just need to implement an LLVM IR interpreter in NQP. How hard could that be? :-) | 17:30 | |
| 12 Apr 2021 | |||
| kind of the same with Pyston and LLVM, I suspect. "Oh pants, we need a baseline JIT too". And Safari? | 09:39 | ||
| 17 Oct 2022 | |||
| Oshawott | My current Configure.pl invocation for Rakudo looks like: ./Configure.pl --gen-moar --moar-option="--build=${TERMUX_BUILD_TUPLE}" --moar-option="--host=${TERMUX_HOST_PLATFORM}" --moar-option="--ar=llvm-ar" --moar-option="--cc=clang" --gen-nqp --backends=moar --prefix=$TERMUX_PREFIX | 18:52 | |
| 21 Feb 2023 | |||
| Nemokosch | imagine targeting LLVM | 09:29 | |
| lizmat | many people have suggested targeting LLVM, none have actually take on that project | 09:33 | |
| irclogs.raku.org/search.html?query...2023-02-21 | 09:34 | ||
| shorter URL: irclogs.raku.org/search.html?query...nel=moarvm | 09:35 | ||
| 2 Oct 2023 | |||
| MasterDuke | huh. thought i'd see if BOLT made any difference after seeing it mentioned in docs.python.org/3.12/whatsnew/3.12...mizations, but it looks like it isn't enabled in arch's llvm 16 package. not sure i care enough to build my own llvm | 20:21 | |