5 Jul 2018 |
Geth |
¦ MoarVM: Use the trusty not the precise llvm repos |
19:10 |
|
travis-ci |
MoarVM build errored. Samantha McVey 'Use the trusty not the precise llvm repos |
19:17 |
|
|
MoarVM build errored. Samantha McVey 'Try adding llvm and clang to packages list' |
21:16 |
|
Geth |
¦ MoarVM: Use the llvm 5.0 toolchain deb line |
21:55 |
|
|
¦ MoarVM: The non versioned url doesn't have llvm 5.0 |
|
|
31 Mar 2019 |
MasterDuke |
timotimo: have you seen www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=new...Time-Trace ? not directly useful to us i assume, but maybe some stuff to take inspiration from |
17:40 |
|
14 Apr 2019 |
Ulti |
FOUND GNU TOOL /usr/local/opt/llvm/bin/clang |
12:29 |
|
29 May 2019 |
timotimo |
i'm still convinced a llvm/clang instrumentation could be built that checks our gc invariants |
23:35 |
|
7 Sep 2019 |
brrt |
llvm toolchain should be getting its own linker one of these days |
13:18 |
|
5 Apr 2020 |
timotimo |
so i looked into what llvm has in terms of vectorization stuff |
13:31 |
|
5 Jun 2020 |
patrickb |
samcv: I'm currently trying to replicate the travis CI config in azure CI. There is a LLVM coverage configuration that generates coverage reports on moarvm.github.io/coverage/ |
19:40 |
|
5 Jan 2021 |
brrt |
llvm has not yet ever worked well for JITs |
14:26 |
|
nwc10 |
I don't yet remember anyone writign a blog post to say "We used LLVM for our dynamic language JIT and it worked really well first time" |
|
|
|
Both Pyston (the first version) and Safari both found that they needed to add another layer before LLVM, didn't they? |
|
|
jnthn |
They had to tier it because the llvm approach was good for high quality code |
14:27 |
|
11 Jan 2021 |
MasterDuke |
openbenchmarking.org/result/200706...&sgm=1 doesn't show much of a difference in compiling the kernel or llvm |
12:05 |
|
24 Jan 2021 |
nine |
I've read here a couple of times (since people keep bringing it up) that LLVM JIT wouldn't be nearly as simple and/or wouldn't work as well as people assume. Looking at the docs I do get the impression that integrating LLVM is hardly straight forward. |
09:10 |
|
25 Jan 2021 |
jnthn |
I didn't yet get chance to read the article about GCC as JIT, to see which of the LLVM as JIT concerns it manages to avoid |
08:13 |
|
9 Apr 2021 |
nwc10 |
we just need to implement an LLVM IR interpreter in NQP. How hard could that be? :-) |
17:30 |
|
12 Apr 2021 |
|
kind of the same with Pyston and LLVM, I suspect. "Oh pants, we need a baseline JIT too". And Safari? |
09:39 |
|
17 Oct 2022 |
Oshawott |
My current Configure.pl invocation for Rakudo looks like: ./Configure.pl --gen-moar --moar-option="--build=${TERMUX_BUILD_TUPLE}" --moar-option="--host=${TERMUX_HOST_PLATFORM}" --moar-option="--ar=llvm-ar" --moar-option="--cc=clang" --gen-nqp --backends=moar --prefix=$TERMUX_PREFIX |
18:52 |
|
21 Feb 2023 |
Nemokosch |
imagine targeting LLVM |
09:29 |
|
lizmat |
many people have suggested targeting LLVM, none have actually take on that project |
09:33 |
|
|
irclogs.raku.org/search.html?query...2023-02-21 |
09:34 |
|
|
shorter URL: irclogs.raku.org/search.html?query...nel=moarvm |
09:35 |
|