|
00:21
MyNetAz left
01:28
guifa left
01:40
ACfromTX joined
02:40
Aedil joined
02:50
kylese left,
hulk joined
02:57
avuserow left
03:15
hulk left,
kylese joined
|
|||
| antononcube | weekly: rakuforprediction.wordpress.com/20...s-of-2025/ | 03:16 | |
| notable6 | antononcube, Noted! (weekly) | ||
| antononcube | Please, pay no attention to the Wolfram|Alpha image. (That is entirely WordPress doing, BTW...) | 03:17 | |
|
03:18
lizmat left
03:21
Aedil left
03:26
Aedil joined
03:30
kylese left
03:35
kylese joined
03:59
avuserow joined
05:30
guifa joined
06:36
guifa left
07:31
[Coke] left
08:52
sena_kun joined
09:11
lizmat joined
09:26
[Coke] joined
09:37
abraxxa-home joined
09:38
abraxxa-home left
09:40
abraxxa-home joined
10:20
sena_kun left
12:26
Sgeo left
|
|||
| TBH, I did not want to do that blog post. It is/was posted too late, i.e. after the New Year. And doing it felt more of a compulsion at some point. | 12:39 | ||
|
13:12
guifa joined
14:09
Aedil_ joined
14:10
Aedil left
14:12
Aedil_ is now known as Aedil
15:05
abraxxa-home left
|
|||
| guifa | Is there any way to obscure submatches but still be able to process them during match? | 15:28 | |
| something like | |||
| my $match = 'a' ~ / <alpha> { say $<alpha> } /; say $match<alpha> # no such key | 15:29 | ||
| antononcube | Shouldn't just // work? | 16:02 | |
|
16:09
sena_kun joined
|
|||
| timo | you want ~~ instead of ~ as well, or you'll just match against $_ instead of "a" | 16:38 | |
|
17:01
guifa left
17:02
guifa joined
|
|||
| ab5tract | m: say "foo"; | 17:28 | |
| camelia | foo | ||
| ab5tract | m: dd my $ret = say "foo"; | ||
| camelia | foo $ret = Bool::True |
||
| ab5tract | say $<alpha> is going to have the value of Bool::True | ||
| or rather, the block containing `say $<alpha` will produce Bool::True | 17:29 | ||
| meltingwax | nice post! brings me back to taking number theory in college | 17:40 | |
| antononcube | @meltingwax Thanks! | 17:45 | |
| timo | guifa: depends on what the code around it looks like, you may be able to use a non-capturing submatch that has the code that does the processing inside of it? | 17:46 | |
| antononcube | Number Theory is my "unshared love" -- I spent lots of time trying to figure out why, what, and how without much success. | ||
| guifa | timo: I could but it feels wasteful to do it twice | 18:01 | |
| antononcube | @meltingwax I was aware of "Math::Sequences" existence, but I thought it "just" had sequences. I did not know or remembered that it had number theoretic functions. (totient, sigma, etc.) | 18:03 | |
|
18:03
Aedil left
|
|||
| timo | guifa: since i don't know your exact needs, i'm not sure what to suggest. you can have a `:my $before; <?{ $before = $/.from; True }> <.alpha> <?{ bla bla }>` though i'm not sure if .from is correct there | 18:10 | |
| guifa | I'm basically doing my standard overkill down the rabbit hol | 18:12 | |
| "Oh, we just added multicast? We need a way to get network interfaces. Well, that means parsing ifconfig. Well, wouldn't that be easier if we had an IPv4 and IPv6 and MAC address tokens?" | 18:13 | ||
| (there's also a further "Sure, but at that point we should probs have a standard class for them too" | |||
| "standard" = go to in module space | 18:14 | ||
| There's an IP::Parse but it kind of combines several pieces of the puzzle and not quite as modular as I'd like | 18:15 | ||
|
19:32
guifa left
20:02
guifa joined
20:19
sena_kun left
20:36
Sgeo joined
21:13
guifa left
21:39
stackspace joined
22:40
lizmat left
|
|||